Skip to main content
Log in

Mutation affecting taste perception in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

ANALYSIS of mutant organisms can elucidate by contrast the development of the normal phenotype and this approach can be used to break down behavioural characteristics into their embryological and physiological components. Taste in insects is a characteristic suitable for such a study. Genetic analysis of taste in Drosophila melanogaster can complement the electrophysiological and anatomical information on taste organs of flies obtained mainly from Calliphora and Phormia. The taste organs of flies are located predominantly on the labella at the tip of the proboscis, and on the tarsi. On each half labellum of Drosophila there are 36–42 taste bristles on the surface and some 25 taste pegs between the pseudotracheae. All but five or six bristles are penetrated by the dendrites of four chemoreceptors (the remaining ones having two dendrites), while there is only one chemoreceptor in each interpseudotracheal peg. Each taste organ is also provided with a mechano-receptor neurone (R. F., Bleiser-Avivi and J. A., in preparation). Of the four dendrites penetrating to the pore at the tip of the taste bristles in Phormia1–3, one is a water sensor, one reacts to sugars and two react to salts4–6.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansen, K., and Heumann, H. G., Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat., 117, 419–442 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Slifer, E. H., Int. Rev. Entomol., 15, 121–142 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sturckow, B., Holbert, P. E., and Adams, J. R., Experientia, 23, 780–782 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dethier, V. G., Q. Rev. Biol., 30, 348–371 (1955); Science, 161, 389–391 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans, D. R., and Mellon Jr, D., J. gen. Physiol., 45, 487–500 (1962); 45, 651–661 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCutchan, M. C., J. Insect Physiol., 15, 2059–2068 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Genesis, 19 v26.

  8. Atidia, J., and Falk, R., Fourth Eur. Drosophila Res. Conf., Umea (1974).

  9. Getting, P. A., and Steinhardt, R. A., J. Insect Physiol., 18, 1673–1681 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindsley, D. L., and Grell, E. H. Genetic Variations of Drosophila melanogaster (Carnegie Institute, Washington Publ., 627, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Bellido, A., and Merriam, J. R., J. exp. Zool., 170, 61–67 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hotta, Y., and Benzer, S., Nature, 240, 527–535 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Merriam, J. R., and Lange, K., Devl Biol., 38, 196–201 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FALK, R., ATIDIA, J. Mutation affecting taste perception in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 254, 325–326 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/254325a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/254325a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation