Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A neuroendocrine feedback mechanism in the insect moulting cycle

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE principles of neuroendocrine integration and regulation developed by the Scharrers1,2 are central to current concepts of the regulation of the hypothalamo–hypophyseal system and are applicable to all neurosecretory systems. The importance of these principles in the regulation of the analogous system in insects (the protocephalic corpus cardiacum–allatum system) has, however, been little studied. Here I illustrate certain general functional parallels in the regulation of the vertebrate and insect systems by reference to work on the regulation of the neurosecretory pathway controlling moulting in Rhodnius prolixus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scharrer, E., and Scharrer, B., Neuroendocrinology (Columbia University Press, New York, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scharrer, E., Res. Publs Ass. Res. nerv. ment. Dis., 43, 1–35 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wigglesworth, V. B., J. exp. Biol., 17, 201–222 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wigglesworth, V. B., Q. Jl microsc. Sci., 77, 191–222 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steel, C. G. H., and Harmsen, R., Gen. comp. Endocrinol., 17, 125–141 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wigglesworth, V. B., Q. Jl microsc. Sci., 79, 91–121 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steel, C. G. H., J. exp. Biol, 58, 177–187 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karlson, P., and Bode, C., J. Insect Physiol., 15, 111–118 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wigglesworth, V. B., J. exp. Biol., 29, 561–570 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halasz, B., J. neurovisc. Rel. Suppl., 9, 329–358 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yates, F. E., Russell, S. M., and Maran, J. W., A. Rev. Physiol., 33, 393–444 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scharrer, B., Neurocirurgia, 29, 257–262 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Kloot, W. G., Am. Zool., 1, 3–9 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, C. N., Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, 103, 120–138 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siew, Y. C., and Gilbert, L. I., J. Insect Phvsiol., 17, 2095–2104 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anwyl, R., J. Insect Physiol., 18, 2143–2154 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Scharrer, E., Archs Anat. microsc. Morph. exp., 54, 359–370 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haskell, P. T., and Moorhouse, J. E., Nature, 197, 56–58 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Steiner, F. A., Ruf, K., and Akert, K., Brain Res., 12, 74–85 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. C. G. H. STEEL

    Present address: Imperial College Field Station, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology and Applied Entomology, Imperial College, London, SW7, UK

    C. G. H. STEEL

Authors
  1. C. G. H. STEEL
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

STEEL, C. A neuroendocrine feedback mechanism in the insect moulting cycle. Nature 253, 267–269 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/253267a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/253267a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation