Abstract
NON-STEROIDAL anti-oestrogens antagonise the effects of oestrogen on uterine growth, vaginal cornification and ovulation1, and their mechanism of action has been suggested to reside in their ability to compete for cytoplasmic oestrogen binding sites, or receptors, thereby reducing the formation of receptor oestrogen complexes2–4. Since the formation of these complexes in oestrogen target tissues, with subsequent translocation to nuclear sites, is considered the primary event in oestrogen action5,6, the reduction in their number would lead to decreased physiological responses to oestrogen. This implies that the receptor antagonist complex should have a lower intrinsic biological activity than that of the receptor oestradiol complex; that is, the ability of the receptor antagonist complex to stimulate oestrogenic responses would be less than that of the receptor oestradiol complex. Based on these assumptions, oestrogen antagonism should be observed after a single injection of oestrogen and antagonists; we have now found that this is not the case. Thus, non-steroidal anti-oestrogens could not be acting as antagonists by competing initially for oestrogen receptors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Emmens, C. W., Ann. Rev. Pharmacol., 4, 237 (1970).
Jensen, E. V., Jacobson, H. I., Flesher, J. W., Saha, N. N., Grupta, G., Smith, S. Colucci, V., Shiplacoff, D., Neumann, H. G., and DeSombre, E. R., in Steroid dynamics (edit. by Pincus, G., Nakao, T., and Tait, J. F.), 133 (Academic Press, New York 1966).
Terenius, L., Acta Endocrinol., 66, 431 (1971).
Rochefort, H., Lignon, F., and Capony, F., Gynec. Invest., 3, 43 (1972).
Clark, J. H., Anderson, J. N., and Peck, E. J., jun., in Receptors for reproductive hormones, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. (edit. by O'Malley, B. W., and Means, A. R.), 36 (Plenum, New York, 1973).
O'Malley, B. W., and Means, A. R., Science, 183, 610 (1974).
Dorfman, R. I., in Methods in hormone research (edit. by Dorfman, R. I.), 2 (Academic Press, New York, 1962).
Lerner, L. J., Rec. Prog. Horm. Res., 20, 119 (1964).
Callantine, M. R., Humphrey, R. R., Lee, S. L., Windsor, B. L., Schottin, N. H., and O'Brien, O. P., Endocrinology, 79, 153.
Clark, J. N. Anderson, J. N., and Peck, E. J., jun., Steroids, 22, 707 (1973).
Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Johnson, H. J., and Carlson, K. E., Biochemistry, 12, 4091 (1973).
Williams, D., and Gorski, J., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 45, 258 (1971).
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. biol. Chem., 193, 265 (1951).
Ceriotti, J., J. biol. Chem., 198, 297 (1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CLARK, J., PECK, E. & ANDERSON, J. Oestrogen receptors and antagonism of steroid hormone action. Nature 251, 446–448 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/251446a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/251446a0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Ocular toxicity in low-dose tamoxifen: A prospective study
Eye (1999)
-
Die Kurzzeitwirkung von Clomiphencitrat (CC) auf die hypophysäre Gonadotropinausschüttung
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (1989)
-
Effect of progestins, androgens, estrogens and antiestrogens on3H-thymidine uptake by human endometrial and endosalpinx cells in vitro
Archives of Gynecology (1987)
-
A new triphenylethylene compound, Fc-1157a
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (1986)