Skip to main content
Log in

Suppression of Disturbing Light Signals in Rapid Flash Kinetic Measurements

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IN the flash kinetic method for investigating rapid photochemical reactions1, a reaction is initiated by a short flash of light and measured by a rapid-response photometer. Improvements of this method (refs. 2–5), particularly by the use of repetitive excitation followed by signal averaging, have increased the sensitivity of the method by a factor of about 100. Although the repetitive procedure eliminates the disturbance caused by statistically random signals, it does not remove disturbing signals related by a fixed phase to the flash sequence. In the study of the primary processes of photosynthesis such a false signal is caused by the fluorescence of chlorophyll, excited by the flashes, which interferes with a photometer signal in the same spectral range. This strong interference can be reduced by restricting the aperture and by electric compensation6,7. The rejection ratio which results, however, limits the sensitivity to a level far above that which might be normally obtained by repetitive signal evaluation5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norrish, R. G. W., and Porter, G., Nature, 164, 658 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Witt, H. T., Moraw, R., and Müller, A., Z. Phys. Chem. N.F., 20, 193 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rüppel, H., thesis, Univ. Marburg, Germany (1962).

  4. Rüppel, H., Bültemann, V., and Witt, H. T., Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 68, 340 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rüppel, H., and Witt, H. T., in Methods in Enzymology, Fast Reactions (Academic Press, Inc., NY, in the press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Döring, G., Stiehl, H.-H., and Witt, H. T., Z. Naturf., 22 B, 639 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rüppel, H., Krog, U., and Witt, H. T., J. Electrochem. Soc., 107, 966 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grau, G., Gürs, K., Müller, R., and Rosenberger, D., Z. Angew. Phys., 17, 16 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaminow, I. P., and Turner, E. H., Appl. Optics, 5, 1612 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolff, C., Buchwald, H.-E., Rüppel, H., and Witt, H. T., Naturwissenschaften, 54, 489 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Döring, G., Bailey, J. L., Kreutz, W., and Witt, H. T., Naturwissenschaften, 55, 220 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson, I. M., and Boardman, N. K., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 112, 403 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BUCHWALD, HE., RÜPPEL, H. Suppression of Disturbing Light Signals in Rapid Flash Kinetic Measurements. Nature 220, 57–58 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/220057a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/220057a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation