Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic Declination in Mediaeval China

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE traditional view that Christopher Columbus discovered magnetic declination on his first voyage to the West Indies in 1492 was put forward with great force by Bertelli1 towards the end of the last century and has been repeated by many since. On the other hand, Crichton Mitchell2, after having examined the evidence on which this claim was based, concluded that not only did Columbus not discover magnetic declination but that the existence of declination was known in Europe as early as 1450. In the past few decades, however, .the Columbus controversy has become irrelevant with the researches of Wang Chen-To3 and Needham4, who have shown that the credit for the discovery of declination must go to the Chinese. Needham, in particular, has tabulated eighteen recorded Chinese compass observations of declination covering the period about 720–1829. These are of interest not only to historians but also to geophysicists, for they represent the earliest recorded direct observations of the Earth's magnetic field. The question of their validity is therefore of great importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertelli, T., Proc. Intern. Meteorol. Congr., Chicago (1893).

  2. Crichton Mitchell, A., Terr. Magnet Atmos. Elec., 42, 241 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Chen-To, Chin. J. Arch., 4, 185 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Needham, J., Science and Civilization in China, 4, Pt. 1, 301 (Cambridge University Press, London, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wylie, A., North China Herald (March 15, 1859); reprinted in Chinese Researches, Sci. Sect. 156 (Shanghai 1897, Peiping 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vestine, E. H., LaPorte, L., Cooper, C., Lange, I., and Hendrix, W. C., Carnegie Inst. Washington, Publ. 578 (1947).

  7. Jenny, W. P., Terr. Magnet Atmos. Elec., 38, 97 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe, N., Nature, 182, 383 (1958); Kagaku, 28, 24 (1958); J. Fac. Sci., Univ. Tokyo (Sect. V), 2, 1 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bullard, E. C., Freedman, C., Gellman, H., and Nixon, J., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, 243, 67 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yukutake, T., Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., 40, 1 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Orlov, V. P., in Physics of the Solid Earth (Akad. Nauk SSSR Izv) (edit. by Burlatskaya, S. P., Nechaeva, T. B., and Petrova, G. N.), 6, 383 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burlatskaya, S. P., Nechaeva, T. B., and Petrova, G. N., Physics of the Solid Earth (Akad. Nauk SSSR Izv), 6, 380 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SMITH, P., NEEDHAM, J. Magnetic Declination in Mediaeval China. Nature 214, 1213–1214 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1038/2141213b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2141213b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation