Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery from X-ray Injury and the Effect of Oxygen

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

OBSERVATIONS were reported recently1,2 on a significant reduction of the extrapolation number of the survival curves of mammalian cell cultures which were exposed in vitro to varying X-ray doses under anoxic, as contrasted to aerobic, conditions. In view of the relationship between the extrapolation number and the extent of recovery from radiation damage, noted in connexion with treatment by fractionated doses of X-rays3,4, fractionated treatment of anoxic cells can be expected to lead to a decrease or lack of recovery. This communication records the results of some preliminary experiments designed to test this possibility. Since access to oxygen is to a great extent reduced in neoplastic cell populations in vivo5, the data should further clarify some of the factors which determine the result of tumour radiation therapy, as commonly practised according to various dose-fractionation schedules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson, J. E., and Révész, L., Rad. Res., 14, 493 (1961). Humphrey, R. M., Dewey, W. C., and Cork, A., Nature, 198, 268 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Révész, L., and Littbrand, B., Nature, 203, 742 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elkind, M. M., and Sutton, H., Rad. Res., 13, 556 (1960). Elkind, M. M., Radiol., 74, 529 (1960). Elkind, M. M., Brookhaven Symp. Biol., 14, 220 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Quastler, H., Proc. Conf. Research on the Radiotherapy of Cancer, American Cancer Society, Inc., 100 (1961).

  5. Gray, L. H., Radiation Biology, edit. by Martin, J. H., 152 (Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Révész, L., and Norman, U., J. Nat. Cancer Inst., 25, 1041 (1960). Révész, L., Glas, U., and Hilding, G., Nature, 198, 260 (1963). Révész, L., Bergstrand, H., and Modig, H., Nature, 198, 1275 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glas, U., and Révész, L., Intern. J. Rad. Biol., 6, 69 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barendsen, G. W., Nature, 193, 1153 (1962). Deering, R. A., and Rice, R., Rad. Res., 17, 774 (1962). Barendsen, G. W., Walter, H. M. D., Fowler, J. F., and Bewley, D. K., Rad. Res., 18, 106 (1963). Schneider, D. O., and Whitmore, G. F., Rad. Res., 18, 286 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, D. R., and Wall, E. T., Genetics, 46, 787 (1961).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Barendsen, G. W., and Walter, H. M. D., Rad. Res., 21, 314 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dewey, D. L., Rad. Res., 19, 64 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alper, T., Physics in Med. and Biol., 8, 365 (1963). Alper, T., Nature, 200, 534 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LITTBRAND, B., RÉVÉSZ, L. Recovery from X-ray Injury and the Effect of Oxygen. Nature 203, 889–891 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/203889a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/203889a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation