Skip to main content
Log in

Biosynthesis of Ethylene

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IT is the purpose of the present communication to describe some further results with carbon-14 precursors of ethylene, and to reconcile the pattern which emerges in these investigations using McIntosh apple tissue sections with that of the fungal system, Penicillium digitatum. The procedures have been described previously1–3, and their reliability for measuring 14C-ethylene and carbon dioxide commented on3; they were altered only in the use of a Cary–Tolbert ionization chamber in place of a Bernstein–Ballentine tube for measuring radiation. In the course of these experiments it was noted that alcohol vapour interferes with the assay for ethylene by dissolving in mercuric perchlorate absorbent where a slow acid-catalysed dehydration occurs. For example, when 10 µl. liquid ethanol was added to 20 ml. of mercuric perchlorate reagent, ethylene appeared at a linear rate for at least 6 h, by which time 0.02 per cent of the alcohol had been converted to olefine. Previously, Young et al.9 reported that ethanol was not measured by the mercuric perchlorate manometric procedure, but they apparently took no account of the duration of contact between alcohol and perchlorate, and it should be noted that gas chromatography detects much smaller quantities of vapour than does manometry. In the work recorded here it was determined that a discernible error could occur only if at the end of a collection period in excess of 1 µc. of 14C-ethanol had been formed in the tissue. In experiments with fumarate and acetate this would require that labelled ethanol form at approximately the same rate as 14CO2, and with other compounds ethanol production would greatly have to exceed 14CO2 evolution. Clearly, under the conditions of the assay, the results are not influenced by this factor except when 14C-ethanol itself was administered to the tissue (Table 1), in which case the apparent transfer of label to ethylene must be dismissed as an artefact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burg, S. P., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 84, 544 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burg, S. P., and Burg, E. A., Plant Physiol., 37, 179 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burg, S. P., and Thimann, K. V., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 95, 450 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson, M. S., and Crane, F. L., Proc. Plant Physiol., 37, 18 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Katz, J., and Wood, H. G., J. Biol. Chem., 235, 2165 (1960).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Noble, E. P., Reed, D. R., and Wang, C. H., Canad. J. Microbiol., 4, 469 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reed, D. J., and Wang, C. H., Canad. J. Microbiol., 5, 59 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, C. H., Persyn, A., and Krackov, J., Nature, 195, 1306 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Young, R. E., Pratt, H. K., and Biale, J. B., Anal. Chem., 24, 551 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURG, S., BURG, E. Biosynthesis of Ethylene. Nature 203, 869–870 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/203869a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/203869a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation