Abstract
I AGREE with much of Mr. Halfacree's views but wish to emphasize those points with which I differ, especially since Halfacree's point of departure is my concept of sea-floor spreading1. Some of the implications I envisage are quite at variance with his scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dietz, R. S., Nature, 190, 854 (1961).
Craig, H., Boato, G., and White, D., in Proc. Second Conf. Nuclear Proc. Geol. Settings, Pub. 400, 29 (U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci.).
Urey, H. C., in Study of the Earth, edit. by White, J. F., 386 (Prentice-Hall).
Rubey, W. W., Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 62, 9, 1111 (1961).
Hess, H. H., J. Marine Res., 14, 4, 423 (1955).
Beloussov, V. V., Basic Problems in Geotectonics, Intern. Earth Sci. Ser. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).
Kay, M., Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem., 48, (1951).
Kuenen, Ph. H., Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 475 (1961).
Dietz, R. S., Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 74, 947 (1963).
Dietz, R. S., J. Geol., 71, 3, 314 (1963).
Jacobs, J. A., Russell, R. D., and Wilson, J. Tuzo, Physics and Geology (McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1959).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DIETZ, R. A Re-cycled Hydroshere?. Nature 202, 280–281 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/202280a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/202280a0
- Springer Nature Limited