Skip to main content
Log in

Decreasing Transpiration of Field Plants by Chemical Closure of Stomata

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

CHEMICALS which close stomata have been described by Zelitch1. When sprayed on leaf surfaces, the compounds decrease transpiration and photosynthesis of detached leaves2 and of maize plants in soil3 by increasing the diffusion resistance of stomata. When sprayed on intact tobacco plants in the greenhouse2 or on sunflowers growing in bins of soil outdoors3, the compounds reduced the loss of water from the soil. It remained to demonstrate the effect of chemical closure of stomata on transpiration by a population of plants in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zelitch, I., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 47, 1423 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zelitch, I., and Waggoner, P. E., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 48, 1101, 1297 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimshi, D., Plant Physiol. (in the press and in preparation).

  4. Morris, L. G., J. Agric. Eng. Res., 4, 161 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Penman, H. L., Rep. Thirteenth Intern. Hort. Cong. London, 2, 913 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Monteith, J. L., in Environmental Control of Plant Growth, edit. by Evans. L. T., 95 (Academic Press, New York, 1963).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WAGGONER, P., MONTEITH, J. & SZEICZ, G. Decreasing Transpiration of Field Plants by Chemical Closure of Stomata. Nature 201, 97–98 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/201097b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/201097b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation