Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of ‘Visible’ Light on 5-Bromouracil-labelled DNA

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

INCORPORATION of 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) into the DNA of bacteriophages, bacteria and mammalian cells results in highly increased sensitivity not only to short-wave ultra-violet light1–4 but also, and even more profoundly, to ‘visible’ light2,4 or more probably to its long-wave ultra-violet component. An attempt was made to determine the photochemical mechanism of this phenomenon, as a logical extension of our earlier work on the mechanism of short-wave (2537 Å) ultra-violet light effects on BUdR-labelled cells and transforming DNA5. It was suspected that photochemical dehalogenation, a reaction already observed with short-wave ultra-violet light6, accounts for most of the lethal effects of ‘visible’ light, especially of the 3000–3600 Å component. The experiments were performed either with intact cells or with protein- and RNA-free DNA isolated from genetically transforming strains of Bacillus subtilis. In a few experiments, a thymine-requiring strain of Escherichia coli, 15 T, was also used. The growth conditions resulting in massive incorporation of BUdR were described earlier7. 5-Bromouracil labelled with carbon-14 was used to label the cell DNA for the chromatographic experiments. A fluorescent lamp (General Electric, warm-white, 20 W) served as the source of ‘visible’ illumination. (Prolonged irradiation of frozen thymine solution with this lamp results in formation of small quantities of the thymine dimer, indicating that a minute fraction of its spectral output is a photochemically active ultra-violet component, which otherwise would scarcely be detectable by the usual spectrophotometric procedures.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kozinski, A. W., and Szybalski, W., Virology, 9, 260 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greer, S., J. Gen. Microbiol., 22, 618 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Djordjevic, B., and Szybalski, W., J. Exp. Med., 112, 509 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stahl, F. W., Crasemann, J. M., Okun, L., Fox, E., and Laird, C., Virology, 13, 98 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Szybalski, W., in Progress in Photobiology, edit. by Christensen, B. C., and Buchmann, B., 542 (Elsevier Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1961); and in The Molecular Basis of Neoplasia, 147 (Univ. Texas Press, Austin, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wacker, A., J. Chim. Phys., 58, 1041 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Opara-Kubinska, Z., Lorkiewicz, Z., and Szybalski, W., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 4, 288 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beukers, R., and Berends, W., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 49, 181 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, K. C., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., 6, 458 (1961–62).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyce, R. P., Ph.D. thesis, Yale University (1961).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WACKER, A., MENNIGMANN, H. & SZYBALSKI, W. Effects of ‘Visible’ Light on 5-Bromouracil-labelled DNA. Nature 196, 685–686 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/196685a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/196685a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation