Skip to main content
Log in

Neural Transplants and Insect Diapause

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE induction and maintenance of larval and pupal diapause are at present thought to be under the direct control of the neuro-endocrine complex associated with the insect brain. Williams1 found that diapausing pupæ of the cecropia moth, Hyalophora cecropia, could be induced to resume development by either a prolonged (6–12 weeks) exposure to a low temperature (4–6 ° C) or by the implantation of the brain of a previously chilled pupa. Unchilled diapause pupal brains were found to be incompetent to induce development when implanted into an unchilled pupa in diapause. The competence or incompetence of a pupal brain appeared to depend on the activity or inactivity of its neurosecretory cells. When active, the neurosecretory cells are responsible for the production of a hormone that is released via the corpora cardiaca and activates the prothoracic glands, which then produce the growth hormone, ecdysone, responsible for the initiation of development2. In the diapause pupa, the neurosecretory activity of the brain is suppressed3, as is its neural impulse activity4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, C. M., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 90, 234 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, C. M., Chemical Basis of Development, 794 (Johns Hopkins Press, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, C. M., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 110, 201 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Kloot, W. G., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 109, 276 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Highnam, K. C., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 99, 73 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fraser, A., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 100, 377 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mitsuhashi, J., and Fukaya, M., Jap. J. App. Entomol. Zool., 4, 127 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Highnam, K. C., and Lusis, O., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 103, 73 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beck, S. D., Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 122, 1 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Van der Kloot, W. G., Ann. Rev. Entomol., 5, 35 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CLOUTIER, E., BECK, S., McLEOD, D. et al. Neural Transplants and Insect Diapause. Nature 195, 1222–1224 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/1951222b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1951222b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation