Skip to main content
Log in

Senescence and Senility

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

NEEDHAM1 has recently claimed that Minot's paradox2: “Senescence is at its maximum in the very young stages and the rate of senescence diminishes with age”, is false. Instead of the relationship = Ġ (where = rate of senescence, Ġ = specific growth-rate) indicated by Minot he advocates the use of the relationship = k/Ġ in which, however, Ġ refers to growth “in the broadest sense .... perhaps in fact anabolism in toto”. It will be argued here that Minot's paradox is derived correctly from the simplest model of a living system; and that Needham's relationship gives only an approximation to the increase in senility in a more complex model. Secondly, it will be suggested that the changes under discussion bear no direct relationship to the rates of anabolism and catabolism at any time, and that changes in senescent systems are not related to changes in specific growth-rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Needham, A. E., Nature, 192, 579 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Minot, C. S., The Problem of Age, Growth and Death (John Murray, London, 1908).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roughton, F. J., Disc. Farad. Soc., 17, 116 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rakowski, Z. Physik Chem., 57, 321 (1907).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

NICHOLLS, P. Senescence and Senility. Nature 194, 506–507 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/194506a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/194506a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation