Skip to main content
Log in

Neurobiology

Attraction is relative not absolute

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1: Activity of an imaginary orbitofrontal neuron reflecting relative reward preference.
Figure 2: Lateral and ventral views of the orbitofrontal cortex of the monkey.

References

  1. Tremblay, L. & Schultz, W. Nature 398, 704–708 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeaman, D. J. Exp. Psychol. 39, 466–483 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rolls, E. T. The Brain and Emotion (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999).

  4. Baylis, L. L. & Gaffan, D. Exp. Brain Res. 86, 617–622 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman-Rakic, P. S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 1445–1453 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Petrides, M. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 1455–1462 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Damasio, A. Descartes' Error (Putnam, New York, 1994).

  8. Thut, G. et al. NeuroReport 8, 1225–1228 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watanabe, M. Nature 382, 629–632 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Watanabe, M. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 225–241 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, M. Attraction is relative not absolute. Nature 398, 661–663 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/19414

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/19414

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation