Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Estimation of Peak Areas in Gas-Liquid Chromatography

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IN proposing the method referred to by Dijkstra, I tried to stress its convenience rather than its extreme accuracy and the examples which I gave were chosen to show that some lack of agreement might be expected in comparing areas determined by this method with areas determined by other methods. However, as Dijkstra points out, results obtained with other methods are less reproducible. Slight differences in the way in which triangles are drawn and small inaccuracies in cutting out curves can give rise to appreciable differences in estimated area. It is also more difficult to measure peak widths at half height accurately than it is to measure retention times. Furthermore, in the case of overlapping peaks it is frequently impossible to get a good estimate of the individual areas by other methods whereas the retention times and peak heights can still be measured and appropriate corrections for peak height applied if necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CARROLL, K. Quantitative Estimation of Peak Areas in Gas-Liquid Chromatography. Nature 192, 965–966 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/192965b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/192965b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation