Abstract
MOST methods for the determination of traces (0.01–1 p.p.m.) of lead in urine require prior removal of organic matter and concentration of the lead by ashing. These methods have several drawbacks : the time required for ashing ; possible interference from other metals such as bismuth ; and the need for careful purification of a variety of reagents to keep the blank reading at a reasonably low level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taeger, H., and Schmidt, P., Z. ges. exp. Med., 100, 717 (1937).
Baker, R. W. R., Biochem. J., 46, 606 (1950).
Machata, G., and Neuninger, H., Wien. med. Wochenschr., 110, 39 (1960).
Allan, J. E., Spectrochim. Acta, 17, 459 (1961).
Malissa, H., and Schöffmann, E., Mikrochim. Acta, 187 (1955).
Box, G. F., and Walsh, A., Spectrochim. Acta, 16, 255 (1960).
Gatehouse, B. M., and Willis, J. B., Spectrochim. Acta (in the press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WILLIS, J. Determination of Lead in Urine by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Nature 191, 381–382 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/191381a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/191381a0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Methacrylsäuremethylester als Extraktions- und Lösungsmittel für die Flammen-AAS. Bestimmung von Selen in technischen Produkten
Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie (1981)