Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular Biology or Ultrastructural Biology?

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

OF all the recently developed types of analytical biology, the field of which Prof. Astbury was one of the main initiators has probably the best claim to the title ‘molecular biology’. But even granting this, it is as well to remember that it was just because Astbury went on from the study of well-defined molecules to investigate entities such as hairs, which can at best by courtesy be called molecular, that he was able to open the doors through which so many people ara now passing. If we want a title for the whole field of which Astbury's work forms a part, but which includes also the study of genes, microsomes, endoplasmic reticulum, antibodies and so on, by techniques only a few of which are definitely chemical, then I submit that we require a name which is more inclusive than ‘molecular biology’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WADDINGTON, C. Molecular Biology or Ultrastructural Biology?. Nature 190, 1124–1125 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/1901124b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1901124b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation