Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of some Metabolic Inhibitors on Antibody Formation

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

RECENTLY the use of metabolic inhibitors, particularly analogues of nucleic acid components, has been proving an effective tool for investigating the processes involved in antibody formation1–8. The direct determination of the metabolic changes attendant on these processes is practically impossible at the present stage. After the first immunizing dose, only a very small proportion (about 1 per cent) of the lymphoid cells isolated from the spleen or the lymph nodes is active in antibody formation. The detection of any biochemical changes in these cells is made exceedingly difficult not only by the large ‘background’ of inactive cells (99 per cent) but also by the absence of serologically demonstrable antibody from the active cells in the initial (inductive) phase. Earlier I showed that the nucleic acid antimetabolite 6-mercaptopurine acts only during this inductive phase, but does not affect antibody production if administered during the productive phase9. If, then, antibody formation is inhibited by means of suitable agents without affecting protein synthesis in general, we may with some degree of plausibility draw conclusions about the processes taking place in the inductive phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malmgren, R. A., Bennison, B. E., and McKinley, T. W., J. Nat. Cancer, 12, 807 (1952).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Šterzl, J., and Holub, M., Cs. biol., 6, 75 (1957); Folia boil., 4, 59 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz, R., Stack, J., and Dameshek, W., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 99, 164 (1958); J. Clin. Invest., 38, 1394 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Uphoff, D. E., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 99, 651 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutton, R. W., Dutton, A. H., et al., Nature, 182, 1377 (1958); Biochem. J., 75, 230 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mecker, W., and Condie, R., et al., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 102, 459 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoyer, L. W., Condie, R. M., and Good, R. A., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 103, 205 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berenbaum, M. C., Nature, 185, 167 (1960).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Šterzl, J., Nature, 185, 256 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Šterzl, J., Folia biol., 3, 1 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bieber, S., Bieber, R., and Hitschings, G. H., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 60, 207 (1955). Thiersch, J. B., ibid., 60, 220 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidelberger, Ch., Chaudhuri, N. K., and Danneberg, P., Nature, 179, 663 (1957).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Škoda, J., Hess, V. F., and Šorm, F., Experientia, 13, 150 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gut, J., Morávek, C., et al., Coll. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun., 24, 3154 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Šterzl, J., The Inductive Phase of Antibody Formation (Prague, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ŠTERZL, J. Effect of some Metabolic Inhibitors on Antibody Formation. Nature 189, 1022–1023 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/1891022a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1891022a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation