Skip to main content
Log in

A New Plasma Confinement Geometry

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

As is well known, the strong synchrotron radiation recently predicted by Trubnikov and Kudryavtsev1 from a plasma containing a magnetic field at thermonuclear temperatures makes it harder to design a thermonuclear reactor using the deuterium–tritium reaction, and practically impossible to design a deuterium–deuterium reactor. One way to get around this difficulty is to have no magnetic field in the plasma, so that the radiation becomes only a surface phenomenon instead of a bulk one. Of all the magnetic confining geometries at present known, theoretically only one has enough stability to hold a pure (that is, β = 8πnkT/B2 = 1) plasma. This is the picket fence or cusped geometry2. Unfortunately, according to Grad3, the cusps will be very leaky. Attempts have been made to construct geometries to avoid these leaks by closing the cusps on themselves (compare the most interesting papers by Braginski and Kadomtsev4). The same idea was proposed independently by Longmire and me some years ago under the name ‘caulked picket fence’5 (Fig. 1). These geometries involved current-carrying rings, disposed inside a solenoid having a longitudinal magnetic field. Quite apart from the topological impossibility of connecting leads or cooling to these rings without making contact with the plasma, the systems were unstable in their toroidal form because there was no rotational transform6 in the torus axial field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trubnikov, B. A., and Kudryavtsev, V. S., Proc. Second U.N. Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 31, 93 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grad, H., Washington Report No. 289, 115 (1955). Tuck, J. L., Washington Report No. 289, 7 (1955). Longmire, C. L., Washington Report No. 289, 11 (1955). Berkowitz, J., et al., Proc. Second U.N. Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 31, 171 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grad, H., Inst. of Math. Sciences, NYO Report No. 7969 (1957). Berkowitz, J., et al., Proc. Second U.N. Int. Conf. Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, 31, 171 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braginski, and Kadomtsev, “Plasma Physics and the Problem of Controlled Thermonuclear Reaction”, U.S.S.R., 3, 300 (1958). Kadomtsev, ibid., 4, 353 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Various classified conferences. Also Longmire and Tuck registration of invention, Los Alamos, February 1957 (unpublished).

  6. Spitzer, L., Physics of Fluids, 1, No. 4, 253 (1958).

  7. Colgate, S. A., and Furth, H., URCL Report No. 5392 (1958).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TUCK, J. A New Plasma Confinement Geometry. Nature 187, 863–864 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1038/187863a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/187863a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation