Skip to main content
Log in

Genetical Differences in Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiourea and to Anti-thyroid Substances

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

FOX1 first observed that people differed in their ability to taste phenylthiourea, and it was found (Blakeslee and Salmon2, Blakeslee3, Snyder4,5) that these differences were genetically determined. The distribution of taste thresholds to this substance in all populations so far studied has been found to be bimodal. Familial investigations indicate that the two classes of individuals, tasters and non-tasters, that is, those relatively sensitive and those relatively insensitive to phenylthiourea, differ in respect of a single gene pair, the tasters being homozygous or heterozygous for the dominant allele, the non-tasters homozygous for the recessive allele. Between one quarter and one third of all individuals tested in various populations appear to fall into the recessive class. Fisher, Huxley and Ford6 have described observations which suggest that similar differences may exist among anthropoid apes. They have pointed out that this implies the existence of a stable, balanced polymorphism, and that, for such a system to occur, the heterozygotes should have had some selective advantage over the two types of homozygotes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fox, A. L., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sri., 18, 115 (1932).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakeslee, A. F., and Salmon, M. R., Eug. News, 16, 105 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blakeslee, A. F., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 18, 120 (1932).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Snyder, L. H., Science, 74, 151 (1931).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder, L. H., Ohio J. Sci., 32, 436 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R. A., Ford, E. B., and Huxley, J., Nature, 144, 750 (1939).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Salmon, T. N., and Blakeslee, A. F., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 21, 78 (1935).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Falconer, D. S., Ann. Eug., 13, 211 (1947).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. v. Skramlik, E., Jena Z. Med. Nat., 76, 50 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder, L. H., and Davidson, D. F., Eug. News, 22, 1 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Riddell, W. J. B., and Wybar, K. C., Nature, 154, 669 (1944).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopkins, C. Y., Canad. J. Res., B, 16, 341 (1938); 20, 268 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chesney, A. M., Clawson, T. A., and Webster, B., Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 43, 261 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webster, B., and Chesney, A. M., Amer. J. Path., 6, 275 (1930)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Astwood, E. B., Bissel, A., and Hughes, A. M., Endocrinology, 37, 456 (1945).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HARRIS, H., KALMUS, H. Genetical Differences in Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiourea and to Anti-thyroid Substances. Nature 163, 878–879 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163878b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163878b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation