Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

[Letters to the Editors]

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

WE are glad that the critical remarks of Jánossy give us an occasion to reconsider the interpretation of our balloon experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rev. Mod. Phys. (in the press).

  2. Richards and Nordheim, Phys. Rev., 74, 1106 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhabha and Chakrabarty, Phys. Rev., 74, 1352 (1948).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Millikan, Neher and Pickering, Phys. Rev., 67, 234 (1943).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physics Department and Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

    BRUNO ROSSI & R. I. HULSIZER

Authors
  1. BRUNO ROSSI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. I. HULSIZER
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ROSSI, B., HULSIZER, R. [Letters to the Editors]. Nature 163, 246–247 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163246b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163246b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Search

Navigation