Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marine Seismic Prospecting

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IN the years immediately preceding the War, considerable progress was made in the use at sea of the seismic method of studying submarine geology, and work wascarried as far as the 100-fathom line. Further progresstodeeper water was rendered difficult by the troubles arising in putting the instruments and explosives on thebottom of the sea. As a result of work in 1938 and 1939, itwas suggested1 that it might be possible to avoid these difficulties by having the instruments hanging in the water and relying on the transmission of the seismic waves from the bottom into the water. Unpublished observationsduring the War, both in Great Britain and in the United States, showed that seismic waves could, in fact, be observed in this way. In order to test the possibilities ofthe method, a direct comparison has been made of the signal received by a geophone on the bottom and by a hydrophone in the water. The explosive was also hanging in the water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bullard, E. C., and Gaskell, T. F., Proc. Roy. Soc, A, 177, 498 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HILL, M., WlLLMORE, P. Marine Seismic Prospecting. Nature 159, 707–708 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1038/159707a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/159707a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation