Skip to main content
Log in

Plant Viruses

  • Article
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

SEVERAL recent papers from the Department of Plant pathology, Rothamsted, and from the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research of Australia make an impressive collection of new knowledge about virus diseases of plants. F. C. Bawden and N. W. Pirie1 show that sap expressed from the leaves of tobacco plants infected with mosaic contains less than one third of the total amount of virus in the plant. The additional virus can be liberated by successive incubations with commercial trypsin, or, even more successfully, with the mixture of enzymes obtained from crops of the snail Helix aspersa. Subsequent fine grinding releases even more virus, which was found to account in all for one third of the total insoluble nitrogen in the leaf, or 10 per cent of its dry matter. J. B. Hale, M. A. Watson and R. Hull2 discuss “some causes of chlorosis and necrosis of sugar-beet foliage”. They describe the symptoms and characteristics of two viruses, one fungus disease and four nutritional disorders of the crop, combining analytical and pathological methods with field experiments. Sugar-beet yellows and manganese deficiency can be distinguished visually, according to the authors, but a little more clarity of comparison would be welcome. The paper is, however, a vigorous attempt to place the field recognition of sugar-beet diseases on a surer basis than hitherto, but still leaves the impression that the advisory pathologist requires the backing of chemist and virus etiologist. A new species of shallot aphis, Myzus ascalonicus, is described by J. P. Doncaster and B. Kassanis3. The aphid resembles Myzus persicœ, and is also a vector of plant viruses. Both the species transmit cucumber virus I, Hyoscyamus virus III and sugar-beet yellows virus. M. ascalonicus transmits dandelion yellow mosaic, whereas M. persicœ does not, though the latter aphid transmits potato Y virus, lettuce and sugar-beet mosaics, and severe etch virus, for which M. ascalonicus is not a vector. Here is further knowledge for use in virus analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brit. J. Exp. Path., 27, 81 (1946).

  2. Ann. App. Biol., 33, No. 1, 13 (1946).

  3. Ann. App. Biol., 33, No. 1, 66 (1946).

  4. Bawden, F. C., and Kassanis, B., Ann. App. Biol., 33, No. 1, 46 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Coun. Sci. and Ind. Res., 18, No. 3, 219 (1945).

  6. J. Coun. Sci. and Ind. Res., 18, No. 3, 209 (1945).

  7. Phytopath., 35, No. 8, 591 (1945).

  8. Phytopath., 35, No. 8, 585 (1945).

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GRAINGER, J. Plant Viruses. Nature 158, 885–886 (1946). https://doi.org/10.1038/158885a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/158885a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation