Abstract
IF a fraction p of a population have the attribute A, then it is well known that if m members out of a sample of N have this attribute, the best estimate of p is and its standard error is or Supposing, therefore, that we want our estimate of p to be correct within a standard error of 10 per cent of its value, we must count a sample containing 100(1 – p) members with the attribute A. If we do not know p roughly before-hand we do not know how large to take our sample. For example, if we wish to estimate the frequency of a type of blood corpuscle, and count 1,000 blood corpuscles in all, we should get such values as 20 ± 1·3 per cent, or 1 ± 0·31 per cent. The former value would be needlessly precise for many purposes. The latter would not differ significantly from an estimate of 2 per cent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HALDANE, J. A Labour-saving Method of Sampling. Nature 155, 49–50 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1038/155049b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/155049b0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Errors of Estimation in Inverse Sampling
Nature (1947)
-
Inverse Binomial Sampling
Nature (1945)
-
Inverse Statistical Variates
Nature (1945)
-
Economy in Sampling
Nature (1945)