Skip to main content
Log in

A Labour-saving Method of Sampling

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IF a fraction p of a population have the attribute A, then it is well known that if m members out of a sample of N have this attribute, the best estimate of p is and its standard error is or Supposing, therefore, that we want our estimate of p to be correct within a standard error of 10 per cent of its value, we must count a sample containing 100(1 – p) members with the attribute A. If we do not know p roughly before-hand we do not know how large to take our sample. For example, if we wish to estimate the frequency of a type of blood corpuscle, and count 1,000 blood corpuscles in all, we should get such values as 20 ± 1·3 per cent, or 1 ± 0·31 per cent. The former value would be needlessly precise for many purposes. The latter would not differ significantly from an estimate of 2 per cent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HALDANE, J. A Labour-saving Method of Sampling. Nature 155, 49–50 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1038/155049b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/155049b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation