Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Man's Most Dangerous Myth

  • Books Received
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE author's thesis is that experience rather than inborn traits determines standards of social conduct, that most so-called lower-grade human types would reach high standards in this respect if given opportunities, that we must not assume standards other than our own to be necessarily inferior but must allow that adaptations in diverse environments give rise to different standards, and that outbreeding promotes vigour. He therefore condemns racial discrimination, especially in the U.S.A., and urges a policy of social amelioration and education, looking to the lowering of racial barriers and to implementing the first principle of the American Declaration of Independence. Race discrimination has, in any event, failed to prevent widespread mixture. He spes the human individual as the developed result of a bundle of genes of many origins, the bundle re-sorting itself in the development of every child. He might perhaps have gone further in this direction by acknowledging that genes are hypothetical, even though the gene hypothesis has more in it than the race hypothesis.

Man's Most Dangerous Myth

The Fallacy of Race. By M. F. Ashley Montagu. Pp xii + 216. (New York: Columbia University Press; London: Oxford University Press, 1942.) 15s. 6d. net.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FLEURE, H. Man's Most Dangerous Myth. Nature 153, 604–605 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/153604a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/153604a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation