Skip to main content
Log in

Substantial equivalence: Its uses and abuses

  • Commentary
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Losey, J.E., et al. Nature 399, 214 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Masood, E. Nature 398, 98 (1999).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Millstone, E., et al. Nature 401, 525–526 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anon. Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations. Paris: OECD, 1986.

  5. Anon. Nature 356, 1– 2 (1992).

  6. Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1989.

  7. Anon. Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology, Paris: OECD, 1993.

  8. Anon. Report of the OECD Workshop on the Toxicological and Nutritional Testing of Novel Foods. SG/ICGB(98) 1, September 1998. Paris: OECD, 1998.

  9. Anon. US Food and Drug Administration. Statement of Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties: Federal Register 57, 22984–23005 (1992).

  10. MacKenzie, D. New Scientist,17 April 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, H. Substantial equivalence: Its uses and abuses. Nat Biotechnol 17, 1042–1043 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/14987

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/14987

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation