Skip to main content
Log in

Photoperiodism in the Plant Kingdom

  • Article
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE announcement of the formative effect of such a dilute factor as relative length of day and night, introduced by Garner and Allard1 as photoperiodism, has become the subject for many studies by ecologists and physiologists. Although different investigators hold divergent and conflicting views as to the exact class even of forms and races within a species, not to speak of the class of distinct species, there seems to be a general consensus of opinion as to the existence in the plant kingdom of three categories or groups of plants in respect of the so-called photoperiodic response or photoperiodic adaptation. The existence, however, of the very large neutral group which possesses no clearly defined critical photoperiod2 might almost alone indicate the invalidity of that classification; but the fundamental fallacy lies in the study of photoperiodism as an isolated episode, without any reference to the preceding (including seed ripening) and subsequent periods in the life-history of the plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garner, W. W., and Allard, H. A., J. Agric. Res., 18, 553 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garner, W. W., and Allard, H. A., Plant Physiol., 8, 347 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eghis, S. A., Trud. detskoseljsk akklim. Sta., 9, 5 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lysenko, T. D. (1928–1932). Cf. Whyte, ref. 7.

  5. Wanser, H. M., Science (n.s.), 56, 313 (1922).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Razumov, V. I., Trud. prikl. Bot. Genet, i Selek., Ser. A., 15, 15 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Whyte, R. O., Biol. Rev., 14, 51 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mackov, F. Åimanskiaron;, M., and Trigubenko, M., Zborn. Robit. Agrofiziol, 1, 55 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eremenko, V. T., Zborn. Robit. Agrofiziol, 2, 36 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eremenko, V. T., C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S., 18, 603 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  11. KostjuÄenko, I. A., and Zaruba&icaron;lo, T. Ja., Selek. Semenovod., 3 (11). 49 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  12. KostjuÄenko, I. A., and Zaruba&icaron;lo, T. Ja.., Ž. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk U.S.S.R., 18/19 (23/27), 81 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gregory, F. G., and Purvis, O. N., NATURE, 138, 973 (1936).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pobedimova, E. G., Priroda, Moskva, 10, 76 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHYTE, R., OLJHOVIKOV, M. Photoperiodism in the Plant Kingdom. Nature 143, 301–302 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1038/143301a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/143301a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation