Skip to main content
Log in

Judgment by Hypothesis

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

PROF. J. B. S. HALDANE (see NATURE, Sept. 4, p. 428), in comparing my attitude towards Prof. E. A. Milne's cosmology with that of Lysenko towards the Russian geneticists, draws an analogy which seems to me little short of fantastic. According to NATURE of August 21, Lysenko treats Darwin's words as dogmas by which to judge and condemn, without examination, the work of modern experimenters. I accused Prof. Milne of imitating the practice of the Aristotelians who treated Aristotle's words as dogmas by which to judge and condemn, without examination, the work of their contemporary experimenters. If there is any analogy to be drawn, it is surely between Lysenko and the Aristotelians (ancient or modern).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DINGLE, H. Judgment by Hypothesis. Nature 140, 589–590 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1038/140589c0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/140589c0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation