Skip to main content
Log in

The Frustration of Science

  • Books Received
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

AMONG the more hopeful signs in the last two years is the growing sense of social responsibility among individual men of science, and the widespread impatience with sabotage of foodstuffs or other products in a world in which hundreds of thousands are still insufficiently nourished or clothed. Naturally enough, both scientific workers awakened to a sense of social responsibility, and the ordinary citizen indignant at so much poverty and distress in the face of the incredible abundance with which science has endowed mankind, have been more concerned to find ways and means of appropriate action than to pause to establish the fundamental causes of this startling but distressing paradox. If, however, we are to make constructive suggestions and evolve a wise policy rather than adopt temporary expedients or palliatives, it is essential that diligent inquiry should be made into the underlying causes of what has rightly been termed the frustration of science.

The Frustration of Science.

By Sir Daniel Hall J. G. Crowther J. D. Bernal Prof. V. H. Mottram Dr. Enid Charles Dr. P. A. Gorer Prof. P. M. S. Blackett. Foreword by Dr. Frederick Soddy. Pp. 144. (London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1935.) 3s. 6d. net.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

B., R. The Frustration of Science . Nature 135, 414–415 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/135414a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/135414a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation