Skip to main content
Log in

Cause of Twinning of Crystals

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IN the course of an investigation1 of optically active uniaxial crystals, I expressed the view that the possibility of twinning of a crystal was connected with a definite pseudo-symmetrical character of its structure as a whole. This statement was seriously attacked by Prof. Friedel, as may be clear from the following quotation of his paper:2 “La formation de la macle est totalement indifférente à la symétrie ou à la pseudo-symétrie de l'édifice cristallin ou des groupes d'atomes qui le constituent. Elle est due uniquement à la rencontre de symétries ou de pseudo-symétries dans les périodes (mailles, simples ou multiples) de cet édifice.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. G. Burgers, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 116, 553; 1927.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. "Au sujet d'un Mémoire de M. W. G. Burgers sur les cristaux uniaxes à pouvoir rotatoire", Comptes rendus, 186, 1788; 1928.

  3. Compare, for example, the explanation of some twin structures exhibited by quartz crystals, by Sir W. H. Bragg, and R. E. Gibbs, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 109, 405; 1925.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. L. Bragg, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 105, 16; 1924.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Similar remarks have been made by F. Heide, Z. Krist., 66, p. 225; 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  6. It may be remarked in this connexion that even Prof. Friedel himself, notwithstanding his definite statement about the cause of twinning quoted above, has made similar remarks in other passages of his treatises, as, for example, in "Leçons de crist.", p. 449.

  7. Z. Krist., 80, 355; 1931.

  8. "Leçons de cristallographie", pp. 392–398; compare also Comptes rendus, 182, 741; 1926.

  9. Proc. Roy. Soc., loc. cit., pp.560–561.

  10. Z. Krist., 72, 218; 1929.

  11. See Z. Krist., 73, 147; 1930.

  12. Z. Krist., 74, 20; 1930.

  13. Compare, for example, W. H. Bragg, "An Introduction to Crystal Analysis", (London, G. Bell, 1928, pp.134 and following); also W. T. Astbury, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 112, 448; 1926.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BURGERS, W. Cause of Twinning of Crystals. Nature 129, 363–364 (1932). https://doi.org/10.1038/129363a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/129363a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation