Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of the Genus Sinanthropus

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

PROF. MARCELLIN BOULE, Director of the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle in Paris, has written to me with reference to my Henderson Lecture, “The Significance of the Peking Man”, extracts from which appeared in NATURE of Feb. 7 (p. 202), to direct my attention to the fact that long before Dr. Weinert expressed doubt as to whether the Peking man should be excluded from the genus Pithecanthropus he had made the same protest. To quote his own words: “Je crois être le premier à avoir rapproché intimement le Sinanthropus du Pithécanthrope. Voyez L'Anthropologie, t. 39 (1929), pp. 455–460.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SMITH, G. Validity of the Genus Sinanthropus. Nature 127, 304–305 (1931). https://doi.org/10.1038/127304b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/127304b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation