Skip to main content
Log in

The Origin of the Continents

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

DR. R. H. RASTALL'S interesting article in NATURE of May 2, p. 646, raises what is perhaps the most difficult problem or group of problems that geophysicists have yet to solve. In considering the origin of the continents, the essential points to be explained are the restriction of the continental blocks to little more than one-third of the earth's surface and the marked asymmetry of their distribution. The formerly popular “tetrahedral” hypothesis, apart from its descriptive inadequacy, has hitherto failed hopelessly when confronted with the principle of isostasy. It clearly implies a process of lateral differentiation whereby the earth's store of granite could become strongly concentrated at the corners and along the edges of the alleged tetrahedron, leaving the interior of the faces, corresponding to the oceanic areas, substantially free from granite. Otherwise the tetrahedral form would be unstable and therefore temporary. No one, however, has succeeded in devising any workable process arising out of the earth's contraction which would lead to such lateral concentration of the continental rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HOLMES, A. The Origin of the Continents. Nature 115, 873–874 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115873a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115873a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation