Skip to main content
Log in

The Origin of Spone-spicules

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

IT is to be regretted that Dr. Bidder (NATURE, February 28), before publishing his criticisms of my theory of the symbiotic origin of sponge-spicules, did not await the publication of the detailed evidence upon which that theory is based. I am loth to enter into controversy with him, but as his letter contains much that is misleading, I feel that I can scarcely pass it over in silence. He speaks of the observation (presumably mine) “that the first rudiment of the spicule in Stelletta is a skeleton-crystal on the tetra-hedral system.” I made no such observation. On the contrary, I endeavoured to show by observations on the silica pearls that the first rudiment is a minute granule resembling a Micrococcus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DENDY, A. The Origin of Spone-spicules. Nature 115, 459–460 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115459b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115459b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation