Skip to main content
Log in

Proposals for a Plumage Bill

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

THE suggestion made by Prof. Duerden (NATURE, January 15) for special breeding of birds as an alternative to prohibiting imports of their plumage is unacceptable to us for several reasons, but of these I need now only mention one, since this one appears to us conclusive. We hold that it would be impossible for the Customs to differentiate between the feathers of those birds which had been “farmed” and of those which had fallen victims to the ruthless plume-hunter. Prof. Duerden is, perhaps, unaware that a scheme similar to that which he adumbrates was advanced in 1914 by the Committee for the Economic Preservation of Birds, and was considered by the Government of the day to be unworkable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DEWAR, W. Proposals for a Plumage Bill. Nature 104, 564–565 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/104564b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/104564b0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation