Skip to main content
Log in

Lummer's “Photographic Optics”

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

NOTHING could have been further from my intention than to do any injustice to Dr. Steinheil or his firm, and I hasten to acknowledge the justice of his criticisms upon the slips contained in my edition of Lummer's book—slips for which I take the entire responsibility. The error on p. 100 in supposing that the Munich view was photographed by Prof. Miethe, of Berlin, arose from a confusion between two sets of telephotographic views sent me from Germany, some of which were taken by Prof. Miethe. I would point out that, in the only case in which the kind of lens used is stated, it is correctly stated to be a Steinheil's lens. I presume Dr. Steinheil is not dissatisfied with the performance of the lens in producing the picture, by whomsoever it was photographed. The other point arose from inserting at the last moment, when the sheets were going to press, a reference to Messrs. R. and J. Beck, which should have been inserted at the end of paragraph four instead of paragraph three of Chapter xi. Let me assure Dr. Steinheil that both points will be corrected in any fresh issue of the text.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

THOMPSON, S. Lummer's “Photographic Optics”. Nature 63, 395–396 (1901). https://doi.org/10.1038/063395e0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/063395e0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation