Skip to main content
Log in

Proportionality of Cause and Effect

  • Letter
  • Published:

From Nature

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Abstract

MR. HAYWARD now affects the air of an injured man, and complains of being charged with “confusing issues” which he neither “raised nor accepted.” He may be convicted out of his own mouth. The following passage occurs in his last letter but one (NATURE, vol. x. p. 25):—“It should be noted that my principal ‘exemplification of unconsciously-formed preconceptions’ was of Mr. Spencer's own choosing, namely, Newton's ‘Second Law of Motion,’” In his last he says:—“The object of my remarks was simply to test the truth of a definite assertion of Mr. Spencer that ‘the Second Law of Motion is an immediate corollary of the preconception of the exact quantitative elation between cause and effect’”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COLLIER, J. Proportionality of Cause and Effect. Nature 10, 84–85 (1874). https://doi.org/10.1038/010084a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/010084a0

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation