Abstract
This study adds to the emerging literature examining empirically the link between population size, other demographic factors and pollution. We contribute by using more reliable estimation techniques and examine two air pollutants. By considering sulfur dioxide, we become the first study to explicitly examine the impact of demographic factors on a pollutant other than carbon dioxide at the cross-national level. We also take into account the urbanization rate and the average household size neglected by many prior cross-national econometric studies. For carbon dioxide emissions we find evidence that population increases are matched by proportional increases in emissions while a higher urbanization rate and lower average household size increase emissions. For sulfur dioxide emissions, we find a U-shaped relationship, with the population-emissions elasticity rising at higher population levels. Urbanization and average household size are not found to be significant determinants of sulfur dioxide emissions. For both pollutants, our results suggest that an increasing share of global emissions will be accounted for by developing countries. Implications for the environmental Kuznets curve literature are described and directions for further work identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bongaarts, J. (1992). Population growth and global warming. Population and Development Review, 18(2), 299-319.
Commoner, B. (1991). Rapid population growth and environmental stress. International Journal of Health Services, 21(2), 199-227.
Commoner, B. (1993). Population, development, and the environment: trends and key issues in the developed countries. International Journal of Health Services, 23(3), 519-539.
Commoner, B., Corr, M., & Stamler, P. J. (1971). The causes of pollution. Environment, 13(3), 2-19.
Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., & Bates, J. M. (1997). The environmental Kuznets curve: An empirical analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401-416.
Cramer, J. C. (1998). Population growth and air quality in California. Demography, 35(1), 45-56.
Cramer, J. C. (2002). Population growth and local air pollution: methods, models, and results. In W. Lutz, A. Prskawetz & W. C. Sanderson (Eds.), Population and environment (A supplement to Vol. 28), Population and development review, pp. 22-52. New York: Population Council.
Cramer, J. C., & Cheney, R. P. (2000). Lost in the ozone: population growth and ozone in California. Population and Environment, 21(3), 315-337.
Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175-179.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212-1217.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A.B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
Hilton, F. G. H., & Levinson, A. (1998). Factoring the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from automotive lead emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35(2), 126-141.
Holdren, J. P. (1991). Population and the energy problem. Population and Environment, 12(3), 231-255.
ITU (2002). Telecommunications and other statistics on CD-Rom. International Telecommunications Union.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, S. J. C. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finitesample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421, 530-533.
Neumayer, E. (2002). Can natural factors explain any cross-country differences in carbon dioxide emissions? Energy Policy, 30(1), 7-12.
Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms (Second Revised Edition). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Neumayer, E. (2004). National carbon dioxide emissions: geography matters. Area, 36(1), 33-40.
MacKellar, F. L., Lutz, W., Prinz, C., & Goujon, A. (1995). Population, households, and CO2 emissions. Population and Development Review, 21(4), 849-865.
O’Neill, B. C., & Chen, B. S. (2002). Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. In W. Lutz, A. Prskawetz & W. C. Sanderson (Eds.), Population and environment (A supplement to Vol. 28). Population and development review, pp. 53-88. New York: Population Council.
O’Neill, B. C., MacKellar, F. W., & Lutz, W. (2001). Population and climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 465-484.
Pariakh, J., & Shukla, V. (1995). Urbanization, energy use and greenhouse effects in economic development. Global Environmental Change, 5(2), 87-103.
Preston, S. H. (1996). The effect of population growth on environmental quality. Population Research and Policy Review, 15(2), 95-108.
Selden, T. M., Forrest, A. S., & Lockhart, J. E. (1999). Analyzing the reductions in U.S. Air pollution emissions: 1970 to 1990. Land Economics, 75(1), 1-21.
Shi, A. (2003). The impact of population pressure on global Carbon dioxide emissions, 1975- 1996: Evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecological Economics, 44(1), 24-42.
Tonn, B. E., Waidley, G., & Petrich, C. (2001). The ageing US population and Environmental policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(6), 851-876.
World Bank (2002). World development indicators on CD-Rom. Washington, DC: World Bank.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003a). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351-365.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003b). Footprints on the earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 279-300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole, M.A., Neumayer, E. Examining the Impact of Demographic Factors on Air Pollution. Population and Environment 26, 5–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039950.85422.eb
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POEN.0000039950.85422.eb