Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Customer Loyalty and Purchase Incidence

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about customer loyalty to brands over many dozens or even hundreds of purchases. In this paper we describe, and seek to explain, such patterns of loyalty in two very different markets: a consumer market (laundry detergents), and a more frequently used service (physicians' prescribing of anti-hypertension drugs). Purchase incidence heterogeneity – a problem in most loyalty studies – is addressed by measuring loyalty at different rates of category purchase (rather than over time). Using share-based measures we expect that loyalty will decline as purchase incidence increases, however we clarify the shape of that decline. We find that, as the number of purchases rises, loyalty initially falls steeply, but after around 15 purchases it starts to stabilize, and from 60 to 200 purchases there is very little change in observed measures of customer loyalty. A comparison of the findings with those expected from a stationary market model (the Dirichlet), suggests that the decline in loyalty seen as the number of purchases rises is largely a statistical artifact, dependent on the number of purchases used to calculate loyalty. However, we also find that the higher loyalty exhibited by heavier buyers at low purchase levels is not captured well by the model. The implication here is that, contrary to a central assumption of the Dirichlet model, brand choice is partially dependent on purchase weight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bass, Frank M., Abel P. Jeuland, and Gordon P. Wright. (1976). “Equilibrium Stochastic Choice and Market Penetration Theories: Derivation and Comparisons,” Management Science, 22(June), 1051–1063.

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. (1997). “Is Your Brand's Loyalty Too Much, Too Little, or Just Right?: Explaining Deviations in Loyalty from the Dirichlet Norm,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 421–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Peter S. Fader, Leonard M. Lodish, and Wayne S. DeSarbo. (1996). “The Relationship between the Marketing Mix and Share of Category Requirements,” Marketing Letters, 7(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, R. M. (1956). “Brand Loyalty — What, Where, How Much?” Harvard Business Review, 34 (January–February), 116–128.

  • Danaher, P. J., I. Wilson, and R. Davis. (2003). “A Comparison of Online and Offline Consumer Brand Loyalty,” Marketing Science, 22(4), 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deighton, John, Caroline M. Henderson, and Scott A. Neslin. (1994). “The Effects of Advertising on Brand Switching and Repeat Purchasing,” Journal of Marketing Research (February), 28–43.

  • Dekimpe, Marnik G., Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp, Martin Mellens, and Piet Vanden Abeele. (1997). “Decline and Variability in Brand Loyalty,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, Grahame R. and Mark D. Uncles. (1997). “Do Customer Loyalty Programs Really Work,” Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • East, Robert and Kathy Hammond. (1996). “The Erosion of Repeat-Purchase Loyalty,” Marketing Letters, 7(2), 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. S. C., M. D. Uncles, and G. J. Goodhardt. (2004). “Understanding Brand Performance Measures: Using Dirichlet Benchmarks,” Journal of Business Research (forthcoming).

  • Fader, Peter S. and David C. Schmittlein. (1993). “Excess Behavioral Loyalty for High-Share Brands: Deviations from the Dirichlet Model for Repeat Purchasing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 478–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhardt, G. J., A. S. C. Ehrenberg, and C. Chatfield. (1984). “The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behaviour,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 147, 621–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J. R. and B. Wernerfelt. (1990). “An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Tod. (1984). “The Myth of Declining Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Advertising Research, 24(February/March), 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman and S. P. Raj. (1991). “An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Brand Loyalty and Consumer Price Elasticity,” Marketing Science, 10(2)(Spring), 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mela, Carl F., Sunil Gupta, and Donald R. Lehmann. (1997). “The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 248–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabavala, Darius J. and Donald G. Morrison. (1977). “A Model of TV Show Loyalty,” Journal of Advertising Research, 17(6), 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, Robert W., Richard Staelin, Joseph B. Kadane, and F. Robert Shoaf. (1977). “Relation of Brand Choice to Purchase Frequency,” Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 458–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Philip. (1997). “Long Run Loyalty — An Exploratory Study,” Marketing and Research Today, 25(2)(May), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, Gerard J. (1988). “Advertising Exposure, Loyalty and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 134–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uncles, Mark D. (1989). BUYER. Buyer Behavior Software.

  • Uncles, Mark D., A. S. C. Ehrenberg, and Kathy Hammond. (1995). “Patterns of Buyer Behavior: Regularities, Models and Extensions,” Marketing Science, 14(3), Part 2 of 2, G71-G78.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathy Hammond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stern, P., Hammond, K. The Relationship Between Customer Loyalty and Purchase Incidence. Marketing Letters 15, 5–19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MARK.0000021967.80283.c8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MARK.0000021967.80283.c8

Navigation