Abstract
This paper deals with the problem of estimating the probability of causation, that is, the probability that one event was the real cause of another, in a given scenario. Starting from structural‐semantical definitions of the probabilities of necessary or sufficient causation (or both), we show how to bound these quantities from data obtained in experimental and observational studies, under general assumptions concerning the data‐generating process. In particular, we strengthen the results of Pearl [39] by presenting sharp bounds based on combined experimental and nonexperimental data under no process assumptions, as well as under the mild assumptions of exogeneity (no confounding) and monotonicity (no prevention). These results delineate more precisely the basic assumptions that must be made before statistical measures such as the excess‐risk‐ratio could be used for assessing attributional quantities such as the probability of causation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Aldrich, Cowles' exogeneity and core exogeneity, Technical Report Discussion Paper 9308, Department of Economics, University of Southampton, England (1993).
L.A. Bailey, L. Gordis and M. Green, Reference guide on epidemiology, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Federal Judicial Center (1994) Available online at http://www.fjc.gov/EVIDENCE/science/sc_ev_sec.html.
A. Balke, Probabilistic counterfactuals: Semantics, computation, and applications, Ph.D. thesis, Computer Science Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA (November 1995).
A. Balke and J. Pearl, Probabilistic evaluation of counterfactual queries, in: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. I (MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1994) pp. 230-237.
A. Balke and J. Pearl, Counterfactuals and policy analysis in structural models, in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 11, eds. P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1995) pp. 11-18.
A. Balke and J. Pearl, Nonparametric bounds on causal effects from partial compliance data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 92(439) (1997) 1-6.
J.S. Breese and D. Heckerman, Decision-theoretic troubleshooting: A framework for repair and experiment, in: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, eds. E. Horvitz and F. Jensen (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1996) pp. 124-132.
P.W. Cheng, From covariation to causation: A causal power theory, Psychological Review 104(2) (1997) 367-405.
P. Cole, Causality in epidemiology, health policy, and law, Journal of Marketing Research 27 (1997) 10279-10285.
A.P. Dawid, Causal inference without counterfactuals, Technical Report, Department of Statistical Science, University College London, UK, 1997. Forthcoming, with discussion, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2000.
P.J. Dhrymes, Econometrics (Springer, New York, 1970).
R.F. Engle, D.F. Hendry and J.F. Richard, Exogeneity, Econometrica 51 (1983) 277-304.
K. Fine, Reasoning with Arbitrary Objects (B. Blackwell, New York, 1985).
F.M. Fisher, A correspondence principle for simultaneous equations models, Econometrica 38(1) (1970) 73-92.
D.A. Freedman and P.B. Stark, The swine flu vaccine and Guillain-Barr´e syndrome: A case study in relative risk and specific causation, Evaluation Review 23(6) (1999) 619-647.
D. Galles and J. Pearl, Testing identifiability of causal effects, in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 11, eds. P. Besnard and S. Hanks (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1995) pp. 185-195.
D. Galles and J. Pearl, Axioms of causal relevance, Artificial Intelligence 97(1-2) (1997) 9-43.
D. Galles and J. Pearl, An axiomatic characterization of causal counterfactuals, Foundations of Science 3(1) (1998) 151-182.
C. Glymour, Psychological and normative theories of causal power and the probabilities of causes, in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, eds. G.F. Cooper and S. Moral (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1998) pp. 166-172.
I.J. Good, A causal calculus, I, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (1961) 305-318.
I.J. Good, A tentative measure of probabilistic causation relevant to the philosophy of the law, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 47 (1993) 99-105.
N. Hall, Two concepts of causation (1998) in press.
J.Y. Halpern, Axiomatizing causal reasoning, in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, eds. G.F. Cooper and S. Moral (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 1998) pp. 202-210.
J.Y. Halpern and J. Pearl, Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach, Technical Report R-266, Cognitive System Laboratory, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles (March 2000).
D.F. Hendry, Dynamic Econometrics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
C.H. Hennekens and J.E. Buring, Epidemiology in Medicine (Brown, Little, Boston, 1987).
G.W. Imbens, Book reviews, Journal of Applied Econometrics 12 (1997).
J.L. Kelsey, A.S. Whittemore, A.S. Evans and W.D. Thompson, Methods in Observational Epidemiology (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996).
M.J. Khoury, W.D. Flanders, S. Greenland and M.J. Adams, On the measurement of susceptibility in epidemiologic studies, American Journal of Epidemiology 129(1) (1989) 183-190.
J. Kim, Causes and events: Mackie on causation, Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971) 426-471. Reprinted in: Causation, eds. E. Sosa and M. Tooley (Oxford University Press, 1993).
D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers (Oxford University Press, New York, 1986).
J.L. Mackie, Causes and conditions, American Philosophical Quarterly 2/4 (1965) 261-264. Reprinted in: Causation, eds. E. Sosa and M. Tooley (Oxford University Press, 1993).
J. Marschak, Statistical inference in economics, in: Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models, ed. T. Koopmans (Wiley, New York, 1950) pp. 1-50. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph 10.
D. Michie, Adapting Good's q theory to the causation of individual events, Machine Intelligence 15 (2000).
J.S. Mill, System of Logic, Vol. 1 (John W. Parker, London, 1843).
J. Pearl, Comment: Graphical models, causality, and intervention, Statistical Science 8 (1993) 266-269.
J. Pearl, A probabilistic calculus of actions, in: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 10, eds. R. Lopez de Mantaras and D. Poole (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1994) pp. 454-462.
J. Pearl, Causal diagrams for experimental research, Biometrika 82 (1995) 669-710.
J. Pearl, Probabilities of causation: three counterfactual interpretations and their identification, Synthese 121(1-2) (1999) 93-149.
J. Pearl, Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (Cambridge University Press, NY, 2000).
D.W. Robertson, The common sense of cause in fact, Texas Law Review 75(7) (1997) 1765-1800.
J.M. Robins, A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period-applications to control of the healthy workers survivor effect, Mathematical Modeling 7 (1986) 1393-1512.
J.M. Robins, A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods, Journal of Chronic Diseases 40(Suppl 2) (1987) 139S-161S.
J.M. Robins and S. Greenland, The probability of causation under a stochastic model for individual risk, Biometrics 45 (1989) 1125-1138.
P. Rosenbaum and D. Rubin, The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrica 70 (1983) 41-55.
J.J. Schlesselman, Case-Control Studies: Design Conduct Analysis (Oxford University Press, New York, 1982).
M.C. Shep, Shall we count the living or the dead? New England Journal of Medicine 259 (1958) 1210-1214.
H.A. Simon, Causal ordering and identifiability, in: Studies in Econometric Method, eds. Wm.C. Hood and T.C. Koopmans (Wiley, New York, 1953) pp. 49-74.
H.A. Simon and N. Rescher, Cause and counterfactual, Philosophy and Science 33 (1966) 323-340.
M.E. Sobel, Effect analysis and causation in linear structural equation models, Psychometrika 55(3) (1990) 495-515.
P. Spirtes, C. Glymour and R. Scheines, Causation, Prediction, and Search (Springer, New York, 1993).
R.H. Strotz and H.O.A. Wold, Recursive versus nonrecursive systems: An attempt at synthesis, Econometrica 28 (1960) 417-427.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, J., Pearl, J. Probabilities of causation: Bounds and identification. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 28, 287–313 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018912507879
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018912507879