Skip to main content
Log in

DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we describe the search strategies developed for docking flexible molecules to macomolecular sites that are incorporated into the widely distributed DOCK software, version 4.0. The search strategies include incremental construction and random conformation search and utilize the existing Coulombic and Lennard-Jones grid-based scoring function. The incremental construction strategy is tested with a panel of 15 crystallographic testcases, created from 12 unique complexes whose ligands vary in size and flexibility. For all testcases, at least one docked position is generated within 2 Å of the crystallographic position. For 7 of 15 testcases, the top scoring position is also within 2 Å of the crystallographic position. The algorithm is fast enough to successfully dock a few testcases within seconds and most within 100 s. The incremental construction and the random search strategy are evaluated as database docking techniques with a database of 51 molecules docked to two of the crystallographic testcases. Incremental construction outperforms random search and is fast enough to reliably rank the database of compounds within 15 s per molecule on an SGI R10000 cpu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morris, G. M., Goodsell, D. S., Huey, R., & Olson A. J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 293.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Judson, R.S., Jaeger, E.P. and Treasurywala, A.M., Theochem-J. Mol. Struct., 114 (1994) 191.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oshiro, C.M., Kuntz, I.D. and Dixon, J.S., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 9 (1995) 113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, K.P. and Ajay, J. Comput. Chem., 16 (1995) 1210. Jones, G., Willett, P. and Glen, R.C., J. Mol. Biol., 254 (1995) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R. C., Leach, A. R. L. and Taylor, R., J. Mol. Biol., 267 (1997) 727.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gehlhaar, D.K., Verkhivker, G.M., Rejto, P.A., Sherman, C.J., Fogel, D.B., Fogel, L.J., and Freer, S.T., Chem. Biol., 2 (1995) 317.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leach, A. R., J. Mol. Biol., 235 (1994) 345.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Westhead, D.R., Clark, D.E., and Murray, C.W., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 11 (1997) 209.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kuntz, I.D., Blaney, J.M., Oatley, S.J., Langridge, R. and Ferrin, T.E., J. Mol. Biol., 161 (1982) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DesJarlais, R.L., Sheridan, R.P., Seibel, G.L., Dixon, J.S., Kuntz, I.D. and Venkataraghavan, R., J. Med. Chem., 31 (1988) 722.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knegtel, R.M.A., Kuntz, I.D. and Oshiro, C.M., J. Mol. Biol., 266 (1997) 424.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, M. D., Kearsley, S. K., Underwood, D. J. and Sheridan, R. P., J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 153.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Welch, W., Ruppert, J. and Jain, A. N., Chem. Biol. 3 (1996) 449.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leach, A.R. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 13 (1992) 730.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mizutani, M. Y., Tomioka, N. and Itai, A., J. Mol. Biol., 243 (1994) 310.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rarey, M., Kramer, B., Lengauer, T. and Klebe, G., J. Mol. Biol., 261 (1996) 470.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rarey, M., Kramer, B. and Lengauer, T., Bioinformatics, 15 (1999) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Makino, S., & Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997), 1812.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, J. and Kollman, P. A., in publication.

  20. Rarey, M., Kramer, B. and Lengauer, T., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 11 (1997) 369.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., Protein Eng., 6 (1993) 723.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meng, E.C., Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem. 13 (1992) 505.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gschwend, D. A. and Kuntz, I. D., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 123.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ewing, T.J.A. and Kuntz, I.D., J. Comput. Chem., 18 (1997) 1175.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ewing, T.J.A., ed., Dock 4.0 User Manual, University of California, San Francisco, 1998, http://www.cmpharm.ucsf.edu/kuntz/dock.html.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shoichet, B.K. and Kuntz, I.D., Protein Eng., 6 (1993) 723.

    Google Scholar 

  27. DesJarlais, R.L. and Dixon, J.S., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 231.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pearlman, D. A., Case, D.A., Caldwell, J. W., Ross, W. S., Cheatham, T. E., DeBolt, S., Ferguson, D., Seibel, G. and Kollman, P., Comput. Phys. Commun., 91 (1995), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R., Comput. J., 77 (1965) 308.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Press, W. H. and Vetterling, W. T., Numerical Recipes: the Art of Scientific Computing, University Press, New York, NY, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Allen, M. P. and Tildesley, D. J., Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, New York, NY, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Krengel, U. (1991). PhD. Thesis. Heidelberg University.

  33. Banner, D. W. and Hadvary, P., J. Biol. Chem., 266 (1991) 20085.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kim, E. E., Baker, C. T., Dwyer, M. D., Murcko, M. A., Rao, B. G., Tung, R. D. and Navia, M. A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 (1995) 1181.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bode, W., Turk, D. and Stuerzebecher, J., Eur. J. Biochem., 193 (1990) 175.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Turk, D., Stuerzebecher, J. and Bode, W., FEBS Lett., 287 (1991) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arni, R., Heinemann, U., Maslowska, M., Tokuoka, R. and Saenger, W., Acta Crystallographer, B43 (1987) 549.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Weber, P. C., Ohlendorf, D. H., Wendoloski, J. J., and Salemme, F.R., Science, 243 (1989) 85.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Monzingo, A. F. and Matthews, B. W., Biochemistry, 23 (1984) 5724.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Teplyakov, A., Wilson, K. S., Orioli, P. and Mangani, S., Acta Crystallographica, D49 (1993) 534.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Christianson, D. W. and Lipscomb, W. N., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 83 (1986) 7568.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bolin, J. T., Filman, D. J., Matthews, D. A., Hamlin, R. C. and Kraut, J., J. Biol. Chem., 257 (1982) 13650.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ferrin, T. E., Huang, C. C., Jarvis, L. E. and Langridge, R., J. Mol. Graphics, 6 (1988) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rusinko, A., Sheridan, R. P., Nilakantan, R., Haraki, K. S., Bauman, N. and Venkataraghavan, R., J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 251.

    Google Scholar 

  45. World Wide Web posting of GOLD evaluation results at http://panizzi.shef.ac.uk/cisrg/gareth/gold/gold.html

  46. Bohm, H.J., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 8 (1994) 243.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jain, A.N., J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des., 10 (1996) 427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ewing, T.J., Makino, S., Skillman, A.G. et al. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15, 411–428 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011115820450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011115820450

Navigation