Skip to main content
Log in

Capital Subsidies and the Performance of Firms

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In many countries, governments grant different capital subsidies to the business sector in order to promote growth. Also the EU, provides this type of subsidies. As De Long and Summers (1991) suggest there may be market failure justifications for public subsidisation of firms. However, because the use of subsidies may cause problems, it is far from clear how they affect long-run economic growth. This study examines the effects on total factor productivity of public capital subsidies to firms in Sweden between 1987 and 1993. Panel data which distinguish between subsidised and unsubsidised firms in the manufacturing industry are used. The results suggest that subsidisation can influence growth, but there seems to be little evidence that the subsidies have affected productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumol, W. J., 1990, ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy 98(5), 893–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beason, R. and D. E. Weinstein, 1996, ‘Growth, Economies of Scale, and Targeting in Japan (1955-1990)’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 78(2), May, 286–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I., 1989, ‘European Integration and Regional Policy’, 1989, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 5(2), 90–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, F., 1998a, ‘Do Capital Subsidies to Firms Increase Employment?’, Chapter 9 in G. Eliasson and N. Karlson (eds.), The Limits of Government: On Policy Competence and Economic Growth, City University Press, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström, F., 1998b, ‘Regional Policy and Convergence of Real per Capita Income among Swedish Counties’, Working Paper No. 284, Stockholm School of Economics.

  • Blomström, M., R. E. Lipsey and M. Zejan, 1996, ‘Is Fixed Investment the Key to Economic Growth?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 111, February, 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brezis, E. S., P. Krugman and D. Tsiddon, 1993, ‘Leapfrogging in International Competition: A Theory of Cycles in National Technological Leadership’, The American Economic Review 83(5), 1211–1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J., 1983, Picking Losers...?, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. and D. R. Barton, 1990, Efficiency in U.S. Manufacturing Industries, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmén, E., 1998, ‘Technology, Technique and Entrepreneurial Activity in Economic Theory: An historical outline’, in J. Odhnoff and U. Svedin (eds.), Technological Systemic Changes and Economic Theories

  • De Long, J. B. and L. H. Summers, 1991, ‘Equipment Investment and Economic growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, May, 445–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU, 1996, Europeiska unionens stöd och lån – Vägledning till gemenskapens finansiering, Byrån för Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella publikationer, Bryssel, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J., 1986, ‘The Soft Budget Constraint’, Kyklos 39(1), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-W., 1996, ‘Government Interventions and Productivity Growth’, Journal of Economic Growth 1, September, 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H., 1966, ‘Allocative Efficiency vs. "XEfficiency"’, The American Economic Review 56(3), 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, E., 1961, Produktivitet och räntabilitet. Studier i kapitalets betydelse inom svenskt näringsliv, Norstedt, Stockholm, Sweden.

  • Maddala, G. S., 1989, Introduction to Econometrics, Maxwell Macmillan Int. Editions, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A., 1982, Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, W. C. and M. C. Munger, 1991, ‘Economic Models of Interest Groups: An Introductory Survey’, American Journal of Political Science 35(2), May, 512–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. J., 1996, ‘Competition and Corporate Performance’, Journal of Political Economy 104(4), 724–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • NUTEK, 1993, Värdet av regionalpolitiken, Report R:43, Stockholm.

  • OECD, 1993, Industrial Policy in OECD Countries – Annual Review, OECD.

  • OECD, 1996, Public Support to Industry, OECD/GD(96)82.

  • Ohlin, G., 1962,’ Review of Lundberg (1961)’, American Economic Review 52, September, 827–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., 1982, The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, J., 1997, ‘Convergence Across the Swedish Counties, 1911–1993’, European Economic Review 41, 1835–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. X., 1996, ‘Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence’, European Economic Review 40, 1325–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. M., 1991, ‘Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition’, CEPR, Discussion paper series, No. 1382.

  • SOU, 1996, Kompetens och kapital – Om statligt stöd till företag, Betänkande från Företagsstödutredningen, SOU 1996: 69, Stockholm.

  • Tsoukalis, L., 1993, ‘Regional Policies and Redistribution’, Ch. 19 in R. T. Griffiths (ed.), The Economic Development of the EEC, An Elgar Reference Collection. Cheltenham. U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., 1980, ‘A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48.

  • Wolff, E. N., 1996, ‘The Productivity Slowdown: The Culprit at Last? Follow-up on Hulten and Wolff’, The American Economic Review 86(5), December, 1239–1252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergström, F. Capital Subsidies and the Performance of Firms. Small Business Economics 14, 183–193 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133217594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008133217594

Keywords

Navigation