Skip to main content
Log in

Simplifying Dynamic River Water Quality Modelling: A Case Study of Inorganic Nitrogen Dynamics in the Crocodile River (South Africa)

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ultimate goal of this study is to develop a simple dynamic river water quality model that can be applicable in a data limited situation and is compatible with typical activated sludge models, so that the model can be used in integrated modelling of wastewater and river water quality in the future. A simplified river water quality model was formulated based on a conceptual hydraulic sub-model and simplification of an existing river water quality model. The simplified water quality was derived from the River Water Quality Model No. 1, which is one of the most comprehensive basic river water quality models available in literature. The applicability of the simplified model in data limited situations was investigated using a case study of inorganic nitrogen (nitrate and ammonia) in the Crocodile River (South Africa). The model was calibrated and validated on the basis of independent data collected for four years (1987–1990). The results show that the model can adequately describe the seasonal dynamics of inorganic nitrogen in the Crocodile River. The sensitivity of the model output to the model inputs was also analysed, and the results indicate that the model is most sensitive to the microbial biomass (nitrifier) followed by hydraulic parameters. The relation of river flow versus concentration of inorganic nitrogen in the downstream section of the river was also examined in order to identify the main source and critical time for nitrate pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderink, R. H., Klaver, N. J. and Noorman, R.: 1995, ‘DUFLOW V 2.0: Micro-computer Package for the Simulation of 1-Dimensional Flow and Water Quality in a Network of Open Water Courses. Modelling Water Quality and Flow in River Vecht using DUFLOW’, in C. Heatwole (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Water Quality Modelling, ASAE, Orlando, FL, U.S.A., pp. 416–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. J., Van Zyl, F. C. and Heath R. G.: 1995, ‘Water quality management in Crocodile River catchment, Eastern Transvaal, South Africa’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 32(5–6), 201–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M. B. and Reda, A.: 1994, ‘Identification and application of a dynamic model for operational management of water quality’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 30(2), 31–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Behrendt, H.: 1993, ‘Separation of point and diffuse loads of pollutants using monitoring data of rivers’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 28(3–5), 165–175.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. C. and Barnwell, T. O.: 1987, The Enhanced Stream Water Quality Model QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS, Documentation and User Manual, EPA-600/3-87/007, U.S. EPA, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, V. T.: 1981, Open Channel Hydraulic: International Student Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Hydrologic Institute (DHI): 1992, MIKE11 User Manual, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF): 1993, South Africa Water Quality Guidelines, Volumes 1–4, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF): 1995, Water Quality Situation Assessment of the Crocodile River Catchment, Eastern Transvaal: Water Quality Management Series, Volumes 1–9, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • ’Theorie du mouvement non permanent des eaux crues des riveres et a lintroduction des marees dans leur lit‘, Comptes rendus des seances de l’Academie des Sciences 36, 147–154, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujer, W., Henze, M., Takashi, M. and Van Loosdrecht, M.: 1999, ‘Activated sludge model No. 3’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 39(1), 183–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, R. and Dong, M.: 1998, ‘Water quality modelling in the watershed-based approach for wasteload allocations’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 38(10), 165–172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, M., Grady, C. P. L., Gujer, W., Marasi, G. v. R. and Matsuo, T.: 1987, Activated Sludge Model No. 1, IAWQ, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henze, M., Harremoës, Jansen, J. C. and Arvin, E.: 1995a, Wastewater Treatment: Biological and Chemical Processes, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wentzel, M. C. and Marais, G. v. R.: 1995b, ‘Activated Sludge Model No. 2. Activated Sludge Model No. 2’, IAWQ Scientific and Technical Report, IAWQ, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleynhans, C. J.: 1999, ‘The development of a fish index to assess the biological integrity of South African rivers’, Water SA 25, 265–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirlaen, J., Huyghebaert, B., Sforzi F., Benedetti, L. and Vanrolleghem, P. A.: 2001, ‘Simultaneous simulation of the integrated urban wastewater system using mechanistic surrogate models’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 43(7), 301–309.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ongley, E. D. and Booty, W. G.: 1999, ‘Pollution remediation planning in developing countries: Conventional modelling versus knowledge-based prediction’, Water Int. 24, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlob, G. T.: 1982, Mathematical Modelling of Water Quality, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichert, P., Borchardt, D., Henze, M., Rauch, W., Shanahan, P., Somlyody, L. and Vanrolleghem, P. A.: 2001, ‘RiverWater Quality Model No. 1 (RWQM1)’, Scientific and Technical Report, IAWQ, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, H. W. and Phelps, E. B.: 1925, A Study of Pollution and Natural Purification of the Ohi River, U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, DC, Bull. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, J. M., Guarino, C. F., Best, H. J. and Tanaka, K.: 1993, ‘Management and institutional aspects’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 27(12), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zel, D. W.: 1977, ‘Analysis of water use in the Crocodile River system’, South African Forestry Journal, 103.

  • Vanhooren, H., Meirlaen, J., Amerlinck, Y., Claeys, F., Vangheluwe, H. and Vanrolleghem, P. A.: 2002, ‘WEST: Modelling biological wastewater treatment’, J. Hydroinformatics 5, 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanrolleghem, P., Borchardt, D., Henze, M., Rauch, W., Reichert, P., Shanahan, P. and Somlyody, L.: 2001, ‘River water quality model No. 1 (RWQM1) III: Biochemical submodel selection’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 43(5), 31–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallingford Software: 1996, ISIS,Wallingford, Oxfordshire, U.K.

  • Wallingford Software: 1994, Salmon-Q User Documentation Version 1.01,Wallingford, Oxfordshire, U.K.

  • Water Resource Engineers: 1973, Computer Program Documentation for te Stream Quality Model QUAL-II Prepared for U.S, Environmental Protection Agency, System Analysis Branch, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, P. G., Young P. and Romberger, O.: 1979, ‘A systems model of stream flow and water quality in the Bedford-Ouse River I. Stream flow modelling’, Water Res. 13, 1155–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolessa Deksissa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deksissa, T., Meirlaen, J., Ashton, P.J. et al. Simplifying Dynamic River Water Quality Modelling: A Case Study of Inorganic Nitrogen Dynamics in the Crocodile River (South Africa). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 155, 303–320 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000026548.20608.a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WATE.0000026548.20608.a0

Navigation