Abstract
This paper presents the incorporation of realistic practice into the formulation of evaluation methodology in environmental planning. The approach is based on the principles of realistic evaluation. The latter, founded on scientific realist philosophy, offers a complete blueprint for evaluation activities and proposes realistic development in policy making. Combining theory and method, as well as qualitative and quantitative procedures, realistic evaluation focuses on testing theories of how outcomes are generated by specific mechanisms, fired and activated in particular contexts. Its commitment to the belief that evaluation research depends on the investigation of causal explanation underlines the fact that environmental interventions are closely connected with and affect social world. In this way the social dimension in environmental interventions is enhanced and a more sophisticated perspective is introduced in the evaluation process. Realistic evaluation offers to environmental planning and development an actual practice into the conduct of evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich, H. E.: 1979, Organizations and Environment, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Aravossis, K., Anagnostopoulos, P., Kungolos, A. and Vliamos, S.: 2001, ‘A new methodology ap-proach for the technical-economical evaluation of alternative waste disposal methods by use of multicriteria analysis’, in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Syros, Greece, September 2001, pp. 40-51.
Benson, J. and Page, W.: 1998, ‘A decision support system for the management of recycling schemes’, J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 41, 445-462.
Bhaskar, R.: 1975, A Realist Theory of Science, Harvester, Brighton.
Briggs, T., Kunsch, P. L. and Mareshall, B.: 1990, ‘Nuclear waste management: an application of the PROMETHEE methods’, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 44, 16-30.
Caruso, C., Colorni, A. and Parucini, M.: 1993, ‘The regional urban solid waste management system: a modeling approach’, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 70, 16-30.
Chelimsky, E.: 1997, ‘The coming transformations in evaluation’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Chen, H. T.: 1990, Theory-Driven Evaluations, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Chen, H. T. and Rossi, P. H.: 1983, ‘Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach’, Eval. Rev.7, 283-302.
Deutscher, I.: 1977, ‘Toward avoiding the goal trap in evaluation research’, in F. C. Caro (ed.), Readings in Evaluation Research, 2nd edn., Russell Sage, New York.
Dyer, J., Edmunds, T., Butler, J. and Jia, J.: 1998, ‘A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium’, Oper. Res. 46, 749-762
Harré, R.: 1972, The Philosophies of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hokkanen, J. and Salminen, P.: 1997, ‘Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis’, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 98, 19-36.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation: 1994, The Program Evaluation Standards, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Karagiannidis, A. and Moussiopoulos, N.: 1997, ‘Application of ELECTRE III for the integrated management of municipal solid wastes in the greater Athens area’, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 97, 439-449.
Lakatos, I.: 1970, ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Moos, R. H.: 1974, Evaluating Treatment Environments: A Social Ecological Approach, John Wiley, New York.
Nakamura, R. T. and Smallwood, F.: 1980, The Politics of Policy Implementation, St. Martins, New York.
North, H. W.: 1997, ‘The independent evaluation of the global environment facility pilot phase’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N.: 1997, Realistic Evaluation, Sage, London.
Pressman, J. and Wildavsky, A.: 1973, Implementation, University of California Press, Berkley.
Roy, B.: 1994, ‘Decision aid and decision making’, in Bana et Costa C. (ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
Skordilis, A.: 1989, ‘Strategy evaluation in the planning of household waste disposal using the heuristic method’, Technika Chronika, Scientific Journal of the Technical Chamber of Greece-Section C 9, 27-39.
Wallace, W.: 1971, The Logic of Science in Sociology, Aldine, New York.
Zraket, C. A. and Clark, W.: 1997, ‘Environmental changes and their measurement: What data should we collect and what collaborative systems do we need for linking knowledge to action?’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds.), Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patavalis, D., Aravossis, K. An Evaluation Approach to Environmental Program and Project Planning. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 4, 421–431 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000044815.05525.eb
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000044815.05525.eb