Abstract
We propose a geomorphic basis for defining riparian areas using the term: riparian ecotone, discuss how past definitions fall short, and illustrate how a linked sequence of definition, delineation, and riparian sampling are used to accurately assess riparian resources on the ground. Our riparian ecotone is based on the width of the valley (its floodprone area width) plus 30 meters on each side to encompass the important adjacent riparian functions, and 15 meters around obvious landslides. A functionally consistent riparian definition and delineation does not derive from land adjacent to a stream, rather it derives from the valley the stream runs through.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, J. R., Sackinger, J. S. and Ringold, P. L.: 2000, Biological Indicators forMonitoring Riparian Forest Condition, USEPA, EPA/600/R-00/048, COR-00-077, May 2000, Corvalis, OR, 49 pp.
Brosofske, K. D., Chen, J., Naiman, R. J. and Franklin, J. F.: 1997, ‘Harvesting effects on microclimatic gradients from small streams to uplands in western Washington’, Ecol. Appl. 7, 1188–1200.
Brown, G.W.: 1980, Forestry and Water Quality, Corvallis, OR, Oregon State Book Stores, Corvallis, 124 pp.
Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C. and LaRoe, E. T.: 1979, ‘Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States’, FSW/OBS-79/31, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biologic Services, Washington, D.C., 102 pp.
Dall, D., Elliott, C. and Peters, D.: 1998, ‘A system for mapping riparian areas in the western United States’, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Lakewood, CO, 15 pp.
DeBano, L. F. and Schmidt, L. J.: 1989, ‘Interrelationship between watershed condition and health of riparian areas in southwestern United States’, in R. E. Gresswell, B. A. Barton and J. L. Kershner (eds.), Practical Approaches to Riparian Resource Management: An Educational Workshop, May 8–11, 1989, Billings, MT, BLM-MT-PT-89-001-4351, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp. 45–52.
Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group: 1998, ‘Stream corridor restoration: Principles, processes, and practices’, 8 chapters and 2 appendices, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.
Fischer, R. A., Martin, C. O., Ratti, J. T. and Guidice, J.: 2001, ‘Riparian terminology: Confusion and clarification’, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS, 7 pp.
Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT): 1993, ‘Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment’, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Forman, R. T. T.: 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge University Press, Great Britain.
Gilbert, G. K.: 1909, ‘The convexity of hilltops’, J. Geology 17, 44–350.
Gebhardt, K. A., Bohn, C. Jensen, S. and Platts, W. S.: 1989, ‘Use of hydrology in riparian classification’, in R. E. Gresswell, B. A. Barton and J. L. Kershner (eds.), Practical Approaches to Riparian Resource Management: An Educational Workshop, May 8–11, 1989, Billings, MT, BLM-MT-PT-89-001-4351, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp. 53–59.
Gregory, S. V.: 1997, ‘Riparian management in the 21st century’, in K. A. Kohm and J. F. Franklin (eds.), Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management, Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 69–86.
Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J. McKee, W. A. and Cummins, K. W.: 1991, ‘An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones’, BioScience 41(8), 540–551.
Hack, J. T. and Goodlett, J. C.: 1960, Geomorphology and Forest Ecology of a Mountain Region in the Central Appalachians, Geological Survey Prof. Pap. 347, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 66 pp.
Hanowski, J. M., Wolter, P. and Niemi, J. G.: 2002, ‘Effects of prescriptive riparian buffers on landscape characteristics in northern Minnesota’, J. American Water Resources Association 38(3), 633–639.
Hunter, M. L. Jr.: 1990, Wildlife, Forests, and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 370 pp.
Hupp, C. R. and Osterkamp, W. R.: 1996, ‘Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphic processes’, Geomorphology 14, 227–295.
Ilhardt, B. L., Verry, E. S. and Palik, B. J.: 2000, ‘Defining riparian areas’, in E. S. Verry, J. W. Hornbeck and C. A. Dolloff (eds.), Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern United States, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 23–42.
Leopold, L. B.: 1994, A View of the River, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 298 pp.
Maclean, N.: 1976, A River Runs through It and Other Stories, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 240 pp.
Naiman, R. J., Fetherston, K. L., McKay, S. and Chen, J.: 1997, ‘Riparian forests’, in R. J. Naiman and R. E. Bilby (eds.), River Ecology and Management: Lessons from the Pacific Coastal Ecoregion, Springer, New York, pp. 289–323.
National Research Council: 2002, Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management, The National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 400 pp.
Parrott, H. A., Marions, D. A. and Perkinson, R. D.: 1997, ‘A four-level hierarchy for organizing stream resources information’, in Proceedings, Headwater Hydrology Symposium, Missoula, MT, American Water Resources Association, Bethesda, MD, pp. 41–44.
Parrott, H., Edwards, C. and Higgins, D.: 2000, ‘Classifying aquatic ecosystems and mapping riparian area’, in E. S. Verry, J. W. Hornbeck and C. A. Dolloff (eds.), Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern United States, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 67–88.
Reeves, G. H., Hohler, D. B., Larsen, D. P., Busch, D. E. Kratz, K., Reynolds, K. Stein, K. F., Atzet, T., Hays, P. and Tehan, M.: 2001, ‘Aquatic and riparian effectiveness monitoring plan for the Northwest Forest Plan’, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, 56 pp, plus Figures and Tables.
Richards, C: 1996, ‘The influence of riparian areas on stream ecosystems, at the Water's Edge: The science of riparian forestry’, Conference Proceedings, BU-6637-S Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, pp. 62–65.
Rosgen, D.: 1994, ‘A classification of natural rivers’, Catena 22, 169–199.
Rosgen, D.: 1996, Applied River Morphology, Wildland Hydrology Press, Pagosa Springs, CO, 376 pp.
Smith, D. S. and Hellmund, P. C.: 1993, Ecology of Greenways: Design and Function of Linear Conservation Areas, University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota.
Sparks, R.: 1995, ‘Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains’, BioScience 45(3), 170.
Trimble, G. R. Jr. and Sartz, R. S.: 1957, ‘How far from a stream should a logging road be located’, J. of Forestry (May), 339–341.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS): 1993, ‘National hierarchical framework of ecological units’, Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Coma, 28 pp.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS): 1994, Watershed Protection and Management, Forest Service Manual Chapter 2520, WO Amendment 2500 94-3, 26 pp.
U.S.Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS): 1998, Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, 206 pp.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA NRCS): 1991, ‘General Manual, 190-GM, part 411’, Washington, D.C., USDA NRCS.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service: 2000, Forest Service Manual, Title 2500, Watershed and Air Management, Section 2526.05, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management: 1993, Riparian Area Management: Process for Assessing Proper Functioning Condition, Tech. Rep. 1739–9, USDI-BLM Service Center, Denver, CO, 51 pp.
U.S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS): 1997, ‘Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to list the northern population of the bog turtle as threatened and the southern population as threatened due to similarity of appearance’, Federal Register 62, 59605–59623.
U.S. EPA: 1993, Guidance for specifying management measure for sources of nonpoint pollution in coastal waters. EPA 840-B-92-002, January 1993, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Verry, E. S.: 2000, ‘Water flow in soils and streams: Sustaining hydrologic function’, in E. S. Verry, J. W. Hornbeck and C. A. Dolloff (eds.), Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern United States, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 99–124.
Verry, E. S.: Land Fragmentation and Impacts to Streams and Fish in the Central and UpperMidwest, Chapter 8, p. 8 (accepted, Society of American Foresters, Book, Bethseda, MD), in press.
Whitney, G. G.: 1994, From CoastalWilderness to Fruited Plain: A History of Environmental Change in Temperate North America 1500 to the Present, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 451 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verry, E.S., Dolloff, C.A. & Manning, M.E. Riparian ecotone: A functional definition and delineation for resource assessment. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 4, 67–94 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012825.77300.08
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012825.77300.08