Skip to main content
Log in

Programs assessing implementation and effectiveness of state forest practice rules and BMPs in the West

  • Published:
Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus

Abstract

The major forest nonpoint source control programs in the West are largely regulatory, either under forest practices acts (California, Idaho, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington) or a streamside management act (Montana). These programs and the specific rules they enforce continue to undergo intensive scrutiny. Still, the questions are the same for these regulatory programs as for states that base nonpoint source control on voluntary BMPs (Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Wyoming). Are the rules or BMPs being applied, and are they effective in reducing nonpoint source pollution to levels that protect beneficial uses of water? The level of debate about forestry in the West has resulted in detailed monitoring and research to answer these questions. In the past, state agencies have assumed levels of BMP compliance based on the percent of operations without enforcement actions. These estimates are being replaced by statistically valid and reproducible monitoring of forest practices rules and BMP compliance levels. BMP effectiveness is being assessed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. This can involve field assessments, process-based research, and control watershed studies. Some trend monitoring is also beginning. With the regional implementation rate for forestry BMPs at about 94% and rising, it is likely that effectiveness testing will continue to be a priority and consume the majority of assessment resources for this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer, S. B., Almas, D., Johnson, M., Stender, P. and Martin, D.: 1988, State of Idaho Forest Practices Water Quality Management Plan, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare — Division of Environment, Water Quality Bureau, Boise, ID, 144 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafferata, P. H. and Munn, J. R.: 2002, Hillslope Monitoring Program: Monitoring Results from 1996 through 2001, Monitoring Study Group Final Report prepared for the California State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA, 114 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/ComboDocument_8_.pdf (March 18, 2003).

  • Cafferata, P. H. and Spittler, T. E.: 1998, ‘Logging impacts of the 1970's vs. the 1990's in the Caspar creek watershed’, in R. R. Ziemer, technical coordinator, Proceedings from the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, May 8, 1998, Ukiah, CA, General Technical Report PSW GTR-168, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp. 103–115. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Board of Forestry (CSBOF): 1993, Assessing the Effectiveness of California's Forest Practice Rules in Protecting Water Quality: Recommendations for a Pilot Monitoring Project and Longer Term Assessment Program, prepared by the Monitoring Study Group with assistance from William M. Kier Associates, Sacramento, CA, 55 pp.

  • California State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection (CSBOF): 1999, Hillslope Monitoring Program: Monitoring Results from 1996 through 1998, interim report prepared by the Monitoring Study Group, Sacramento, CA, 70 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/rept9.pdf (March 18, 2003).

  • California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB): 1987, Final Report of the Forest Practice Rules Assessment Team to the State Water Resources Control Board(the 208 Report), California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA, 200 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colla, J. and DuPont, J.: 2000, Forest Practices Water Quality Audit 1999, Idaho Department of Lands, Coeur d'Alene, ID, 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS): 1998, Colorado Forest Stewardship Guidelines to ProtectWater Quality — Best Management Practices for Colorado, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. S. and O'Laughlin, J.: 2000, Toward Sustainable Forest Management. Part II — The Role and Effect of Timber Harvesting in Idaho, Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group, Report 19, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. On the world wide web at www.uidaho.edu/cfwr/pag/pdfs/Report19.pdf (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, R. A., Bassman, A. and Moore, B. C.: 1996, 'Monitoring timber harvest impacts on stream sedimentation: Instream vs. upslope methods, Western Journal of Applied Forestry 11(1): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundy, T., Ice, G., Whittemore, R., Chen, C. and Bolton, S.: 2001, 'The Mica Creek watershed study: Hydrologic model testing and comparison, in Proceedings of the 2001 NCASI West Coast Regional Meeting, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupp, C. E., Metzler, J., Grost, R. T. and Tappel, P.: 1999, Monitoring Approach and Procedures to Evaluate Effectiveness of Culverts in Providing Upstream Passage of Salmonids, TFW-MAG1-99-006, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 53 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, L.: 2001, Harvest Effects on Riparian Functions and Structure under Current Oregon Forest Practice Rules, technical report 12, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR. On the world wide web at http://159.121.125.11/FP/fpmp/Projects/Riparian_Inventory/RipFunFinal.pdf (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, L.: 2002, Forest Practices Monitoring Program Strategy, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR, 32 pp. On the world wide web at http://159.121.125.11/FP/fpmp/default.htm (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Natural Resources (DNR): 2002, Forests and Fish Report (1999). On the world wide web at http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/forestpractices/rules/forestsandfish.pdf (March 18, 2003).

  • Durgin, P. B., Johnston, R. R. and Parsons, A. M.: 1989, Critical Sites Erosion Study, Technical Report Vol. I: Causes of Erosion on Private Timberlands in Northern California: Observations of the Interdisciplinary Team, final report prepared by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Arcata, CA, 50 pp.

  • Ethridge, R.: 2003, Montana Forestry Best Management Practices Monitoring — The 2002 Forestry BMP Audit Report, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Missoula, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethridge, R. and Heffernan, P.: 2001, Montana Forestry Best Management Practices Monitoring — The 2000 Forestry BMP Audit Report, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Missoula, MT, 69 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. P., Hashim, W. A., Roberts, D., Hempleman, C. and Filip, D.: 2000, Washington's Water Quality Management Plan to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 583 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzel, J., McGowan, M., Smith, D. and Beechie, T.: 2000, Streamside Buffers and Large Woody Debris Recruitment: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Watershed Analysis Prescriptions in the North Cascades Region, TFW-MAG1-00-003, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 38 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • HDR Engineering, Inc.: 2002, Lochsa River Temperature Model, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, J. A. (ed.): 1998, The Dictionary of Forestry, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelscher, B., DuPont, J., Robertson, C., Hinson, J., McGreer, D. and Schult, D.: 2001, Forest Practices Water Quality Audit 2000, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID, 36 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holter, J.: 2001, The History of Washington's Forest Practices Rules, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 12 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D., Henson, S. and Kappe, K.: 1982, Utah Silvicultural Nonpoint Source Assessment Report, State of Utah, Natural Resources and Energy, Division of State Lands and Forestry.

  • Ice, G. G.: 2002, ‘Assessing nonpoint source pollution and setting water quality standards: Lessons from forest watershed research’, Hydrologic Science and Technology 18(1–4): 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ice, G. G. and Binkley, D.: 2003, ‘Forest streamwater concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus: A comparison with EPA's proposed water quality criteria’, Journal of Forestry 101(1): 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ice, G., Loehle, C., Beebe, J. and Cundy, T.: 2002, ‘Calibrating and validating hydrologic model performance for a forested watershed in a snow regime: The dueling model mica creek watershed study’, in Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, NV. On CD-ROM.

  • Ice, G. and Reiter, M.: in press, ‘Lessons learned about watershed assessments’, in Proceedings of the 2002 American Institute of Hydrology Annual Meeting, American Institute of Hydrology, St. Paul, MN.

  • Ice, G. G. and Stuart, G. W.: 2001, 2000 Progress Report. State Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Programs for Silviculture — Sustained Success, National Association of State Foresters (NASF), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. K.: 2002, Wyoming Silvicultural Best Management Practices Field Audit: Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation, Wyoming Timber Industry Association c/o Louisiana Pacific Corporation, Saratoga, WY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.: 1998, ‘Evaluating the impacts of logging activities on erosion and suspended sediment transport in the caspar creek watersheds’, in R. R. Ziemer, technical coordinator, Proceedings from the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, May 6, 1998, Ukiah, CA, General Technical Report PSW GTR—168, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp. 55–69. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Mori, S. R., Keppeler, E. T. and Ziemer, R. R.: 2001, ‘Impacts of logging on storm peak flows, flow volumes and suspended sediment loads in Caspar Creek, California’, in M. S. Wigmosta and S. J. Burges (eds.), Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas. Water Science and Application Volume 2, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 85–125. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. and Rice, R.: 1989, Critical Sites Erosion Study. Tech. Rep. Vol. II: Site Conditions Related to Erosion on Private Timberlands in Northern California, final report prepared by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Arcata, CA, 95 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, F., Rich, A., Rynearson, G., Thornburgh, D. and Trush, W.: 1999, Report of the Scientific Review Panel on California Forest Practice Rules and Salmonid Habitat, California Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA, 92 pp. On the world wide web at http://ceres.ca.gov/cra/srp.html (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGreer, D. J., Cundy, T. W. and Gravelle, J. A.: 1995, ‘Mica creek cumulative watershed effects study’, in T. J. Ward (ed.), Watershed Management: Planning for the 21st Century, pp. 300-309, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montana Environmental Quality Council (EQC): 1988, House Joint Resolution 49 — Forest Practices and Watershed Effects, Report to the 51st Montana Legislature, 93 pp.

  • Montana Department of Environmental Quality (Montana DEQ): 2001, Montana Nonpoint Source Management Plan: A Watershed Approach, Montana Department of Environmental Quality Helena, MT. On the world wide web at http://www.deq.state.mt.us/ppa/nonpoint/NonpointPlan.asp (March 18, 2003).

  • O'Connell, M. A., Hallett, J. G., West, S. D., Kelsey, K. A., Manuwal, D. A., and Pearson, S. F.: 2000, Effectiveness of Riparian Management Zones in Providing Habitat for Wildlife, TFW-LWAG1-00-001, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 461 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ): 2002, Oregon Department of Forestry and Department of Environmental Quality Sufficiency Analysis: A Statewide Evaluation of FPA Effectiveness in Protecting Water Quality, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J., Dent, L. and Allen, M.: 2002, ODF Compliance with Fish Passage and Peak Flow Requirements at Stream Crossing, Final Study Results, ODF Technical Report 14, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR. On the world wide web at http://159.121.125.11/FP/fpmp/default.htm (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pentec Environmental, Inc.: 1991, Methods of Testing Effectiveness of Washington's Forest Practice Rules and Regulations with Regard to Sediment Production and Transport to Streams, TFWWQ8-91-008, Pentec Environmental, Inc., Edmonds, WA, 133 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plum Creek Timber Company: 2000, Final Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan. On the world wide web at http://www.plumcreek.com/environment/HCP-fish.cfm (March 18, 2003).

  • Rae, S. P.: 1995, Board of Forestry PilotMonitoring Program: Instream Component, report submitted to the California Department of Forestry under Interagency Agreement No. 8CA28103, Vol. 1, 49 pp., Vol. 2: Data Tables and Training Materials, California Department of Forestry, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashin, E., Clishe, C., Loch, A. and Bell, J.: 1999, Effectiveness of Forest Road and Timber Harvest Best Management Practices with Respect to Sediment-Related Water Quality Impacts, TFW-WQ6-99-001, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 118 pp. plus appendices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashin, E. and Graber, C.: 1992, Effectiveness ofWashington's Forest Practice RiparianManagement Zone Regulations for Protection of Stream Temperature, TFW-WQ6-92-001, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 88 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashin, E. and Graber, C.: 1993, Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for Aerial Application of Forest Pesticides, TFW-WQ1-93-001, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 137 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rey, M.: 1980, ‘The effect of the clean water act on forestry practices’, in Proceedings: U. S. Forestry and Water and Water Quality: What Course in the 80's, pp. 11–30. Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuett-Hames, D. and Conrad, B.: 2002, Proposed Study Design for Monitoring the Effectiveness of the FFR Riparian Prescriptions, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, Olympia, WA, 27 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuett-Hames, D., Sturhan, N., Lautz, K., McIntosh, R., Gough, M. and Rodgers, C.: 1996, Proposal for a TFWMonitoring Strategy to Determine Effectiveness of Forest Practices in Protecting Aquatic Resources, TFW-AM9-96-007, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, Olympia,WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soicher, A.: 1999a, Assessing the Effectiveness of Large Woody Debris Prescriptions in the Acme Watershed. Phase 1 — Baseline Data Collection, TFW-MAG1-99-002, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soicher, A.: 1999b, Assessing the Effectiveness of Mass Wasting Prescriptions in the Acme Watershed. Phase 1 — Baseline Data Collection, TFW-MAG1-99-003, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 31 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spittler, T. E.: 1995, Pilot Monitoring Program Geologic Input for the Hillslope Component, report submitted to the California Department of Forestry under Interagency Agreement No. 8CA38400, Sacramento, CA, 18 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/PMP-geology.pdf (March 18, 2003).

  • Timber, Fish and Wildlife Field Implementation Committee (TFW): 1991, 1991 Forest Practices Compliance Survey, TFW-000-98-001, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 173 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timber, Fish and Wildlife Field Implementation Committee (TFW): 1994, 1993 Riparian Management Zone Survey, TFW-000-94-001, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 21 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuttle, A. E.: 1995, Board of Forestry Pilot Monitoring Program: Hillslope Component, report submitted to CDF/CSBOF under Contract No. 9CA38120, Sacramento, CA, 29 pp plus Appendices A and B: Hillslope Monitoring Instructions and Forms. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/tuttle.pdf (March 18, 2003).

  • USDA Forest Service (USDAFS): 1992, Investigating Water Quality in the Pacific Southwest Region: Best Management Practices Evaluation Program — User's Guide, USDA Forest Service, Region 5, San Francisco, CA, 158 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (USDAFS): 2002, Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. On the world wide web at http://www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/4801/FIADB/rpa_tabler/Draft_RPA_2002_ Forest_Resource_Tables.pdf. (March 13, 2003).

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): 1977, SAM 31-Regulatory Programs for Nonpoint Source Control, September 22, 1977, EPA Water Planning Division, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Forest Practices Board: 1997, Standard Methodology for Conducting Watershed Analysis under Chapter 222–22 WAC, Version 4.0. On the world wide web at http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fp/ops/wsamanual.html (March 18, 2003).

  • Wing, M. and Skaugset, A.: 1998, 'GIS casts a line: Examining salmon habitat in Oregon streams, Geo Info Systems 8(7): 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaroban, D. W., Love, B., Colla, J., Lesch, G., Heimer, J., Lehner, J., Lukens, B., Poirier, S., Lee, B. and David, K.: 1997, Forest Practices Water Quality Audit 1996, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare — Division of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemer, R. R., technical coordinator: 1998, Proceedings of the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, May 6, 1998, Ukiah, CA, General Technical Report PSW GTR-168, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 149 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.us/projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).

  • Ziemer, R. R.: 2001, ‘Caspar Creek’, in T. Marutani, G. J. Brierley, N. A. Trustrum and M. Page, (eds.), Source-to-Sink Sedimentary Cascades in Pacific Rim Geo-systems, Matsumoto SaboWork Office, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Motomachi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan, pp. 78–85. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw/fs.fed.us/projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Ice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ice, G., Dent, L., Robben, J. et al. Programs assessing implementation and effectiveness of state forest practice rules and BMPs in the West. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 4, 143–169 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012821.68577.6b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012821.68577.6b

Navigation