Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Encouraging the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices: A review of policy tool use and effectiveness in the eastern United States

  • Published:
Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus

Abstract

States use a variety of approaches to encourage landowners and loggers to apply ecologically-sustainable timber harvesting practices, the latter generically referred to as timber harvesting guidelines. A survey of 37 state forestry agency administrators in the eastern U.S. (defined as a contiguous region with the northwest and southwest borders being North Dakota and Texas, respectively) was conducted in 2000 to assess the extent and nature of state guideline programs and the various methods by which states encourage their use. The study found states in the eastern U.S. use a variety of policy tools to promote guideline use, with certain policy tools more common for certain target audiences (e.g., loggers) as well as the types of resources (e.g., wildlife habitat) addressed by the guidelines. Eighty-three percent of the programs directed at encouraging forest landowners in the eastern U.S. to use the timber harvesting practices identified in their state guidebooks are technical assistance, educational, or cost-share programs. Technical assistance and education programs are the most common policy tools used to assist loggers in applying sustainable harvesting practices. Technical assistance and cost-share programs consistently rank among the most effective policy tools for encouraging loggers and landowners to apply the guidelines. Comparing the level of program investment to perceived benefits, assistance programs and education programs rank most efficient landowner programs, whereas premium prices for products and preferential access to contracts are the two most efficient programs directed at loggers. The paper concludes with an assessment of emerging trends and additional information needs associated with encouraging the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blinn, C. R., Kilgore, M. A.: 2001, ‘Riparian management practices: A summary of state guidelines’, Journal of Forestry 99(8): 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinn, C. R., Alden, A. M., Ellefson, P. V.: 2001, ‘Timber harvester perceptions of costs and benefits from applying water quality BMPs in north-central USA’, International Journal of Forest Engineering 12(1): 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummel, K. R.: 1993, Timber Harvesting Costs and Group Selection Silviculture, American Pulpwood Association, Washington, DC, Technical Release 93-R-42, 2 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage, F., Lickwar, P.: 1991, Estimating the Costs of Water Quality Protection on Private Forest Lands in Georgia, Research Division, Georgia Forestry Commission, Georgia Forest Research Paper No. 86, 9 pp.

  • Dillman, D. A.: 2000, Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, New York, J. Wiley, 464 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellefson, P. V., Kilgore, M. A., Phillips, M. J.: 2001, ‘Monitoring compliance with BMPs: The experience of state forestry agencies’, Journal of Forestry 99(1): 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellefson, P. V., Cheng, A. S., Moulton, R. J.: 1995, Regulation of Private Forestry Practices by State Governments, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Station Bulletin no. 605, 225 pp.

  • Ellefson, P. V., Miles, P. D.: 1985, ‘Protecting water quality in the Midwest: Impact on timber harvesting costs’, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 2: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, D. B.: 1996, ‘Maine's Forest Practice Act: Land use, regulations, and implementation’, in Proceedings of the 1995 Society of American Foresters Convention, Portland, Maine, Oct. 28–Nov. 1, 1995, Bethesda, MD, SAF. pp. 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabinski, T.: 1993, Construction of a Portable Bridge, West Engineering Zone, Three Rivers District, Kootenai National Forest, USDA Forest service, Engineering Field Notes 25: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J.: 1987, Inexpensive Logging Access Bridge, American Pulpwood Association, Washington, DC, Technical Release 87-R-45, 2 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge, D. B., Rickenbach, M. G., Broderick, S. H.: 1999, ‘Regulation and stumpage prices: A tale of two states’, Journal of Forestry 97(10): 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluender, R., Stokes, B.: 1999, The Effect of Removal Intensity and Tree Size on Harvesting Cost, American Pulpwood Association, Washington, DC, Technical Release 99-R-3, 2 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickwar, P., Hickman, C., Cubbage, F.W.: 1992, ‘Costs of protecting water quality during harvesting on private forestlands in the southeast’, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 16: 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D. L.: 1997, The Cost of Regulation in the Interior of British Columbia, Canadian Forest Industries, April/May: 52, 54, 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. J., Cengel, D. J., Watson, W. F., Clark, J. D., Hodges, D. G., Rudis, V. A.: 1994, ‘A benefitcost comparison of providing scenic beauty in the Ouachita National Forest’, pp. 39–51’, in John and Loren Kellogg (eds.), Sessions, Advanced 102 Technology in Forest Operations: Applied Ecology in Action Proceedings, Council on Forest Engineering, Portland/Corvallis, Oregon, July 24–29, 1994, 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, R. M., Haney, H. L., Jr., Worell, E. G., Aust, W. M.: 1998, ‘Forestry BMP implementation costs for Virginia’, Forest Products Journal 48(9): 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, R. M., Meade, G. S.: 1997, ‘Evaluation of harvest planning training’, Forest Products Journal 47(7/8): 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, W. C.: 1990, ‘Legislative regulations of private forestry practices in the United States — recent trends’, in F. Schmithusen (ed.), Forestry Legislation: Report of the IUFROWorking Party S4.08–03, Zurich, Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule, Forstwissenschaftliche Beitrage no. 10, pp. 349–364.

  • Smidt, M.: 2000, Predicting Costs for Best Management Practices, University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service, Lexington, KY, The Kentucky Logjam 6(1): 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. B., Vissage, J. S., Darr, D. R. and Sheffield, R. M.: 2001, Forest Resources of the United States, 1997, U.S. Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-219, 190 pp.

  • Vasievich, J. M., Edgar, C.: 1998, Economic Implications of Proposed Forest Management Guidelines for Minnesota, Minnesota Forest Resources Council, St. Paul, MN, 78 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 115 Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Avenue North, St. Paul, MN, 55108, U.S.A

    Michael A. Kilgore & Charles R. Blinn

Authors
  1. Michael A. Kilgore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles R. Blinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Kilgore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilgore, M.A., Blinn, C.R. Encouraging the application of sustainable timber harvesting practices: A review of policy tool use and effectiveness in the eastern United States. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 4, 203–216 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012818.42409.f4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012818.42409.f4

Search

Navigation