Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Loblolly pine response to wet-weather harvesting on wet flats after 5 years

  • Published:
Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus

Abstract

The timing of forestry operations relative to weather conditions is a consideration in applying Forestry Best Management Practices (BMPs). Harvesting during different seasons can result in degrees of soil disturbance, the distribution of logging debris, and potentially future stand productivity. The purpose of this study is to examine the response of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stands after wet- and dry-weather harvesting combined with three site preparation treatments. A 20 × 20 meter grid was established in fifteen 20-year-old, 3.3-ha loblolly pine plantations in South Carolina. A census of soil physical disturbance and slash distribution was made after harvesting. Growth was measured on 1/125th-ha plots at ages two and five. Dry-weather harvested (DWH) sites were 91% undisturbed, and 9% compressed. Wet-weather harvested (WWH) sites were 41% undisturbed, and 59% disturbed. WWH sites averaged 9% bare soil, while DWH sites averaged 16% with 1 kg m-2 less logging residue; primarily in the form of heavy and light slash. At age five, the green-weight biomass of flat-planted DWH and WWH sites were 13.3 and 12.6 kg tree-1 respectively, and on the bedded DWH and WWH sites were 18.6 and 22.8 kg tree-1. Wet weather harvesting did not seem to adversely affect stand growth, and may have improved it. Due to a prolonged drought, bedding had a larger effect on WWH sites than DWH harvested sites. The effects of droughty conditions may be influencing treatment response on these highly productive sites; however, the long-term effects of harvesting on stand growth remain to be seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFPA: 2002, The Sustainable Forestry Initiative Program, 7th Annual Progress Report [Online]. American Forest & Paper Association, Washington, DC, available from: http://www.afandpa.org/forestry/sfi/AnnualRep7_long.pdf [Accessed 30 September 2002].

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, H. L. and Campbell R. G.: 1988, ‘Wet site pine management in the Southeastern United States’, in D. D. Hook et al. (eds.), The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Vol 2. Management, Use and Value of Wetlands, Timber Press, Portland, OR, U.S.A. pp. 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust, W. M.: 1994, ‘Best management practices for forested wetlands in the southern Appalachian region’, Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 77, 457–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust, W. M., Schoenholtz, S. H., Zaebst, T. W. and Szabo, B. A.: 1997, ‘Recovery status of a Baldcybress-Tupelo Wetland seven years after harvesting’, For. Ecol. Manage. 90, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aust, W. M., Burger, J. A., McKee, W. H., Scheerer, G. A. and Tippet, M. D.: 1998, ‘Compaction and rutting during harvesting affect better drained soils more than poorly drained soils on wet pine flats’, J. Appl. For. 19(2), 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. B. and Langdon, O. G.: 1990, ‘Loblolly pine’, in R. M. Burns and B. H. Honkala (eds.), Silvics of North America, Vol. 1, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp. 497–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, V. C., Jr.: 1987, ‘Green and dry-weight equations for above-ground components of planted loblolly pine trees in the west Gulf region’, South J. of Appl. For. 11(4), 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borders, B. E. and Bailey, R. L.: 2001, ‘Loblolly pine: Pushing the limits of growth’, South J. of Appl. For. 25, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. A. and Kluender, R. A.: 1982, ‘Site Preparation — Piedmont’, in USDA Forest Service, Proceedings of The Loblolly Pine Ecosystem, Raleigh, NC, USA, Dec. 8–10, 1982, pp. 58–74.

  • Burger, J. A., Wimms, K. J., Stuart, W. B. and Walbridge, T. A., Jr.: 1988, ‘Site disturbance and machine performance from tree length skidding with a rubber-tired skidder’, in Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Southern Silviculture Research Conference, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 521–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, J. A.: 1994, ‘Cumulative effects of silvicultural technology on sustained forest productivity’, in IEA proceedings, Frederickston, New Brunswick, Canada, pp. 59–70.

  • Burger, J. A. and Kelting, D. L.: 1998, ‘Soil quality monitoring for assessing sustainable forest management’, in J. M. Bigham, D. M. Kral, M. K. Viney, The Contribution of Soil Science to the Development of and Implementation of Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management, Soil Sci. Soc. of America, Madison,WI, Special Publication Number 53. pp. 17–52.

  • Childs, S. W., Shade, S. P., Miles, D. W. R., Shepard, E. and Froehlich, H. A.: 1989, ‘Soil physical properties: Importance to long-term forest productivity’, in D. A. Perry et al. (eds.), Maintaining the Long-Term Productivity of Pacific Northwest Forest Ecosystems, Timber Press, Portland, OR, pp. 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, R. C. and Hartsell, A. J.: 2002, Forest Area and Conditions: Southern Forest Resource Assessment [Online] USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station. Available from: http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/sustain/report/hlth1/hlth1.htm [Accessed 8 August 2002].

  • Cowardin, L. M., Carter, V., Golet, F. C. and Laroe, E. T.: 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States, USDA Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, FWS/OBS-79/31, 131 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbies, M. H., Burger, J. A., Xu, Y. and Patterson, S.: 2002, ‘Distribution of slash and litter after wet and dry site harvesting of loblolly pine plantations’, in K.W. Outcalt (ed.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, USDA, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Ashville, NC, Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-48. pp. 510–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. E.: 1983, ‘What do we need to know about forest productivity, and how can we measure it?’, in R. Ballard and S. P. Gessel (eds.), IUFRO Symposium on Forest Site and Continuous Productivity, USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-163, pp. 2–12.

  • Fox, T. R.: 2000, ‘Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations’, For. Ecol. Manage. 138, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y. and Karr, B. L.: 1989, ‘Influence of trafficking and soil moisture on bulk density and porosity on smithdale sandy loam in North-Central Mississippi’, in Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Southern Silviculture Research Conference, USDA Forest Service, pp. 533–538.

  • Gessel, S. P.: 1981, ‘Impacts of modern forestry on continuing forest productivity’, in M. Nishizawa (ed.), Proceedings of Forest Resource Inventory, Growth Models, Management, Planning, and Remote Sensing, XVII IUFRO World Congress, Sep. 6–12, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Gomez, A., Powers, R. F., Singer, M. J. and Horwath, W. R.: 2002, ‘Soil compaction effects on growth of young ponderosa pine following litter removal in California's Sierra Nevada’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 1334–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greacen, E. L. and Sands, R.: 1980, ‘Compaction of forest soils — a review’, Aust. J. Soil Res. 18, 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, L. W., Maki, T. E. and Sanderford, S. G.: 1975, ‘The effects of mechanical site preparation treatments on soil productivity and tree growth’, in B. Bernier and C. Winget (eds.), Forest Soils and Forest Land Management, Laval Univ. Press, Quebec, pp. 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelting, D. L., Burger, J. A., Patterson, S. C., Aust, W. M., Miwa, M., Trettin, C. C.: 1999, ‘Soil quality assessment in domesticated forests — a southern pine example’, For. Ecol. Manage. 122(1–2), 167–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelting, D. L.: 1999, Timber Harvesting and Site Preparation Effects on Soil Quality for Loblolly Pine Growing on the Lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina, Ph.D. Disertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. 197 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmins, J. P.: 1996, ‘The health and integrity of forest ecosystems: Are they threatened by forestry?’, Ecosystem Health, 2(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, T. T.: 1999, ‘Soil compaction and growth of woody plants’, Scandinavian J. of For. Res., 14, 596–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liski, J., Pussinen, A., Pingoud, K., MSkipSS R. R. and Karjalainen T.: 2001, ‘Which rotation length is favorable to carbon sequestration?’, Can. J. of For. Res., 31(11), 2004–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, T. W.: 1999, ‘Forest harvesting disturbance and site preparation effects on soil processes and vegetation in a young pine plantation’, Masters Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, R. B.: 1999, ‘Four common myths about plantation forestry’, New Forests, 17(1–3), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miwa, M.: 1999, Physical and Hydrologic Responses of an Intensively Managed Loblolly Pine Plantation to Forest Harvesting and Site Preparation, Ph.D. Dissertation. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 172 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA: 2002, Climate Data [Online], National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Prediction Center, Camp Springs, Maryland 20746, available from: http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov./products/monitoring_and_data/us.html [Accessed 30 April 2002].

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. R. and McNab, W. H.: 1982, Total-Tree Green Weights of Sapling-Size Pines in Georgia, Georgia Forestry Commission, Georgia Forest Research Paper no. 39. 19 pp.

  • Powers, R. F., Alban, N. H., Miller, R. E., Tiarks, A. E., Wells, C. G., Avers, P. E., Cline, R. G., Fitzgerald, R. D. and Loftus, N. S., Jr.: 1990, ‘Sustaining site productivity in North American forests: Problems and prospects’, in S. P. Gessel, D. S. Lacata, G. F. Weetman and R. F. Powers (eds.), Sustained Productivity of Forest Soils, Proceedings, 7th North American Forest Soils Conference, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry Publication, Vancouver, B.C. pp. 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestemon, J. P. and Abt, R. C.: 2002, Timber Products Supply and Demand: Southern Forest Resource Assessment, [Online], USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station. Available from: http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/sustain/report/timbr1/timbr1.htm [Accessed 8 August 2002].

  • Prichett, W. L. and Fisher, R. F.: 1987, Properties and Management of Forest Soils, Second Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 494 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachel, J. M. and Karr, B. L.: 1989, ‘Effects of current harvesting practices on the physical properties of loessal soil in West-Central Mississippi’, in Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Southern Silviculture Research Conference, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp. 527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheriff, D. W. and Nambiar, E. K. S.: 1995, ‘Effect of subsoil compaction and three densities of simulated root channels in the subsoil on growth, carbon gain, and water uptake of Pinus radiata’, Australian J. of Plant Physiology, 22, 1001–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of American Foresters: 2000, SAF Code of Ethics, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Startsev, A. D. and McNabb, D. H.: 2001, ‘Skidder traffic effects on water retention, pore-size distribution and van Genuchten parameters of boreal forest soils’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. L.: 1975, ‘Soil and man's use of forest land’, in B. Benier, and C. H. Winget (eds.), Forest Soils and Forest Land Management, Les Presses de L'Universite Laval, Quebec, pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuck, W. M.: 1982, Soil Survey of Colleton County, South Carolina, USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, R. D. and Chilingar G. V.: 1955, ‘Summary of “concerning some additional aids in studying sedimentary formations, by M. S. Shvetsov”’, J. of Sed. Petrology, 25(3), 229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, T. A. and Hughes J. H.: 1975. ‘The effects of intensive management on planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) growth on poorly drained soils of the Atlantic Coastal Plain’, in Forest soils and Forest Land Management, Proceedings, Fourth North American Forest Soils Conference, Laval University Press, Quebec, PQ, pp. 351–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service: 2001, RPA Assessment of Forest and Range Lands, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, FS-687, 78 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallinger, R. S.: 1978, ‘The forest situation’, in W. E. Balmer (ed.), Soil Moisture — Site Productivity Symposium Proceedings, Myrtle Beach, S.C. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp. 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. V. and Luxmoore, R. J.: 1988, ‘Infiltration, macroporosity, and mesoporosity distribution on two forested watersheds’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 329–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrel R. and Hampson, A.: 1997, ‘The influence of some forest operations on the sustainable,anagement of forest soils — a review’, Forestry, 70(1), 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Burger, J. A., Aust, W. M., Patterson, S. C., Miwa, M., Preston, D. P.: 2002, ‘Changes in surface water table depth and soil physical properties after harvest and establishment of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Atlantic coastal plain wetlands of South Carolina’, Soil Tillage Res. 63(3–4), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry, VirginiaTech, 228 Cheatham Hall, Mail Code 0324, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, U.S.A

    Mark H. Eisenbies, James A. Burger & W. Michael Aust

  2. MeadWestvaco Corp., P.O. Box 1950, Summerville, SC, 29484, U.S.A

    Steve C. Patterson

Authors
  1. Mark H. Eisenbies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Burger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Michael Aust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steve C. Patterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark H. Eisenbies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenbies, M.H., Burger, J.A., Aust, W.M. et al. Loblolly pine response to wet-weather harvesting on wet flats after 5 years. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 4, 217–233 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012817.20157.d3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012817.20157.d3

Search

Navigation