Skip to main content
Log in

Are indications for prostatectomy in octogenarians the same as for younger men?

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prostatectomy for benign hypertrophy of the prostate is usually performed to alleviate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We assessed indications for and risks of prostatectomy in men 80 years of age and compared them to those for younger men in order to determine whether indications for prostatectomy in octogenarians are different than these for younger men. Medical records of 171 men comprised of 84 patients >80 years of age (mean 84.4) and 87 patients <65 years of age (mean 60.6) who underwent prostatectomy for benign prostate hypertrophy were reviewed. Data regarding indications for surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists system grade, anesthesia and surgery performed, duration of hospitalization and intrahospital postoperative complications were obtained. The respective indications for surgery in the very elderly and younger patients were: urinary retention with indwelling catheter in 46 (55%) and 34 (39%) (p < 0.04), LUTS in 32 (38%) and 52 (59%) (p < 0.005), and gross hematuria in 6 (7%) and 1 (1.2%). Transurethral prostatectomy was performed in 47 elderly patients (56%) and in 30 young patients (34.5%). The other patients in each group underwent open (suprapubic prostatectomy) surgery. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the elderly group (39% vs 22%, p < 0.05), with major complications occurring only in this group. Indications for surgery were different for octogenarians than for younger men. Morbidity and mortality rates were significantly higher among the elderly men. Age appears to be an independent risk factor for complications associated with prostatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirby RS. The natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia: what have we learned in the last decade? Urology 2000; 56(5 Suppl 1): 3–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 1989; 141: 243–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reid BC, Alberg AJ, Klassen AC et al. The American Society of Anesthesiologists' class as a comorbidity index in a cohort of head and neck cancer surgical patients. Head Neck 2001; 23: 985–994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baine WB, Yu W, Summe JP, Weis KA. Epidemiologic trends in the evaluation and treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in elderly male Medicare patients from 1991 to 1995. J Urol 1998; 160: 816–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollander JB, Diokno AC. Prostatism: benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23: 75–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burney TL, Badlani GH. Anesthetic considerations in the geriatric patient. Urol Clin North Am 1996; 23: 19–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Luttwak Z, Lask D, Abarbanel J et al. Transvesical prostatectomy in elderly patients. J Urol 1997; 157: 2210–2211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, Russell S, Uchino S. Postoperative serious adverse events in a teaching hospital: a prospective study. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 216–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Greenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadu, A., Mabjeesh, N.J., Ben-Chaim, J. et al. Are indications for prostatectomy in octogenarians the same as for younger men?. Int Urol Nephrol 36, 47–50 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UROL.0000032683.36827.63

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UROL.0000032683.36827.63

Navigation