Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic significance of a grading system considering tumor heterogeneity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fact that urothelial carcinomas (UC)often contain areas with different histologicgrades has been recently shown to bear someprognostic relevance. Here we examined theprognostic significance of a grading systemconsidering tumor heterogeneity inmuscle-invasive bladder carcinomas.151 UC treated by radical cystectomy wereincluded. According to the World HealthOrganization/International Society ofUrological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification,histologic grade was low-grade (LG) in 8 andhigh-grade (HG) in 143 cases. 65 HG tumorswhich focally harbored LG areas were assignedto mixed-type (MT) carcinomas. Mean follow-upwas 50 months.While the WHO/ISUP classification showedno significant correlation withdisease-specific survival (p = 0.3995 bylog-rank test), stratification into LG/MT andHG tumors had a significant prognosticrelevance (p = 0.0404). Nodal status wasidentified as the only independent prognosticfactor (p = 0.0001 by multivariate analysis).In this respect, stratification into LG/MT andHG tumors missed the level of statisticalsignificance by a norrow margin (p = 0.07 bymultivariate analysis), but it turned outbetter than tumor category (p = 0.08).In conclusion, a grading systemconsidering tumor heterogeneity may improve thepredictive power of the WHO/ISUP classificationin muscle-invasive UC of the urinary bladder.Although the two-tired grading system proposedin this study was not identified as anindependent prognostic factor, it may help toobtain additional prognostic information onpatients with advanced bladder cancer treatedby radical cystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gleason DF. Histologic grading and clinical staging of carcinoma of the prostate. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1977: 171-197.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng L, Neumann RM, Nehra A et al. Cancer heterogeneity and its biologic implications in the grading of urothelial carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88: 1663-1670.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR et al. The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22: 1435-1438.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH et al. TNM Atlas. Illustrated Guide to the TNM/pTNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1997: 309-314.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torroni H. Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumors, Vol 10. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1973: 39-43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiminez RE, Gheiler E, Oskanian P et al. Grading the invasive component of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and its relationship with progression-free survival. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 980-987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haitel A, Posch B, El-Baz M et al. Bilharzial related, organ confined, muscle invasive bladder cancer: prognostic value of apoptosis markers, proliferation markers, p53, E-cadherin, epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB-2. J Urol 2001; 165: 1481-1487.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Krüger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krüger, S., Thorns, C., Böhle, A. et al. Prognostic significance of a grading system considering tumor heterogeneity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Int Urol Nephrol 35, 169–173 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UROL.0000020305.70637.c6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UROL.0000020305.70637.c6

Navigation