Skip to main content

Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery


A model for pore pressure-dependent cleat permeability is presented for gas-desorbing, linear elastic coalbeds under uniaxial strain conditions experienced in producing reservoirs. In the model, changes in the cleat permeability of coalbeds, which are idealised to have a bundled matchstick geometry, is controlled by the prevailing effective horizontal stresses normal to the cleats. Variations in the effective horizontal stresses under uniaxial strain conditions are expressed as a function of pore pressure reduction during drawdown, which includes a cleat compression term and a matrix shrinkage term that have competing effects on cleat permeability. A comprehensive analysis has revealed that the shape of the stress – pore pressure curve is predominantly determined by the magnitude of recovery pressure and rebound pressure relative to the initial reservoir pressure. A total of five possible scenarios have been identified with regard to response of the horizontal stress function to reservoir drawdown. When applied to four coalbed wells at two separate sites in the fairway of the San Juan basin, the model predictions at one site, where the three wells have shown increased absolute permeability during gas production, are in excellent agreement with the published pore pressure dependent permeability changes that were obtained independently from history matching the field production data. At a separate site the model correctly predicts, at least qualitatively, a strong permeability rebound at lower drawdown pressures that has been inferred through history matching the production data. An analysis of the effects of initial reservoir pressure on the response of effective horizontal stress to drawdown was carried out, with reference to the range of pressure likely to be encountered in the San Juan basin. The implications of this in terms of pore pressure dependent permeability are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Bear, J. and Corapcioglu, M. Y.: 1981, A mathematical model for consolidation in a theroelastic aquifer due to hot water injection or pumping, Water Resour. Res. 17, 723–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durucan, S. and Edwards, J. S.: 1986, The effects of stress and fracturing on permeability of coal, Mining Sci. Tech. 3, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, A. and Beckie, R.: 2000, Flow of coalbed methane to a gallery, Transport Porous Media 41, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, I.: 1987, Reservoir engineering in coal seams: Part 1 – The physical process of gas storage and movement in coal seams, SPE Reservoir Eng. February 1987, 28–34.

  • Harpalani, S. and Zhao, X.: 1989, An investigation of the effect of gas desorption on coal permeability formation, Proc. Coalbed Methane Symp., Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 17–20 April, pp. 57–64.

  • Harpalani, S. and Chen, G.: 1995, Estimation of changes in fracture porosity of coal with gas emission, Fuel 74, 1491–1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. R.: 1996, Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs, in R. Gayer and T. Harris (eds.), Coalbed Methane and Coal Geology, Geology Society, Special Publication 109, pp. 197–212.

  • Mavor, M. J. and Vaughn, J. E.: 1997, Increasing absolute permeability in the San Juan basin Fruitland formation, Proc. 1997 Int. Coalbed Methane Symp., Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 12–16 May, pp. 33–45.

  • McKee, C. R., Bumb, A. C. and Koenig, R. A.: 1987, Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal, Proc. Coalbed Methane Symp., Tuscaloosa, Alabama (November), pp. 183–193.

  • Nowacki, W.: 1975, Dynamic Problems of Thermoelasticity, Noordhoff, Leiden, The Netherlands.

  • Palmer, I. and Mansoori, J.: 1996, How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model, paper SPE 36737 presented at the 1996 Ann. Tech. Conf., Denver, Colorado, 6–9 October.

  • Puri, R. and Seidle, J.: 1991, Measurement of stress dependent permeability in colas and its influence on coalbed methane production, Proc. 1991 Coalbed Methane Symp., Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 13– 16 May, pp. 415–424.

  • Seidle, J. P. and Huitt, L. G.: 1995, Experimental measurement of coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption and implications for cleat permeability increases, paper SPE 30010 presented at 1995 SPE International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, China, 14–17 November.

  • Seidle, J. P., Jeansonne, D. J. and Erickson, D. J.: 1992, Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals, paper SPE 24361 presented at SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming, 18–21 May, pp. 433–444.

  • Somerton, W. H., Soylemezoglu, I. M. and Dudley, R. C.: 1975, Effect of stress on permeability of coal to gas and water, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Absr. 12, 129–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Q. Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, J.Q., Durucan, S. Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery. Transport in Porous Media 56, 1–16 (2004).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

  • coalbed methane
  • matrix shrinkage
  • cleat compressibility
  • permeability model