Advertisement

Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 345–360 | Cite as

Free Flow at the Interface of Porous Surfaces: A Generalization of the Taylor Brush Configuration

  • U. Shavit
  • R. Rosenzweig
  • S. Assouline
Article

Abstract

A solution to the problem of shallow laminar water flow above a porous surface is essential when modeling phenomena such as erosion, resuspension, and mass transfer between the porous media and the flow above it. Previous studies proposed theoretical, experimental, and numerical insight with no single general solution to the problem. Many studies have used the Brinkman equation, while others showed that it does not represent the actual interface flow conditions. In this paper we show that the interface macroscopic velocity can be accurately modeled by introducing a modification to the Brinkman equation. A moving average approach was proved to be successful when choosing the correct representative elementary volume and comparing the macroscopic solution with the average microscopic flow. As the size of the representative elementary volume was found to be equal to the product of the square root of the permeability and an exponential function of the porosity, a general solution is now available for any brush configuration. Given the properties of the porous media (porosity and permeability), the flow height and its driving force, a complete macroscopic solution of the interface flow is obtained.

Brinkman Darcy Stokes REV porous media interface flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, P. M. and Mills, P. M.: 1979, Motion and rupture of a porous sphere in a linear flow field, J. Rheol. 23, 25–37.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, A. J. and Khalili, A.: 1999, Computation of flow through a fluid–sediment interface in a benthic chamber, Phys. Fluids 11(6), 1395–1405.Google Scholar
  3. Beavers, G. S. and Joseph, D. D.: 1967, Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall, J. Fluid Mech. 30, 197–207.Google Scholar
  4. Beavers, G. S., Sparrow, E. M. and Magnuson, R. A.: 1970, Experiments on coupled parallel flows in a channel and a bounding porous medium, J. Basic Eng. 92D 843–848.Google Scholar
  5. Beavers, G. S., Sparrow, E. M. and Masha, B. A.: 1974, Boundary condition at a porous surface which bounds a fluid flow, AIChE J. 20, 596–597.Google Scholar
  6. Brinkman, H. C.: 1947, A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles, Appl. Sci. Res. 1, 27–34.Google Scholar
  7. Durlofsky, L. and Brady, J. F.: 1987, Analysis of the Brinkman equation as a model for flow in porous media, Phys. Fluids 30, 3329.Google Scholar
  8. Gray, W. G. and O'Neill, K.: 1976, On the general equations for flow in porous media and their reduction to Darcy's law, Water Resour. Res. 12, 148–154.Google Scholar
  9. Happel, J. and Brenner, H.: 1973, Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics, Noordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  10. Howells, I. D.: 1974, Drag due to the motion of a Newtonian fluid through a sparse random array of small rigid fixed objects, J. Fluid Mech. 64, 449–475.Google Scholar
  11. James, D. F. and Davis, A. M. J.: 2001, Flow at the interface of a model fibrous porous medium, J. Fluid Mech. 426, 47–72.Google Scholar
  12. Jennings, A. A. and Pisipati, R.: 1999, The impact of Brinkman's extension of Darcy's law in the neighborhood of a circular preferential flow pathway, Environ. Model. Software 14, 427–435.Google Scholar
  13. Kaviany, M.: 1995, Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, S. and Russell, W. B.: 1985, Modeling of porous media by renormalization of the Stokes equations, J. Fluid Mech. 154, 269–286.Google Scholar
  15. Koplik, J., Levine, H. and Zee, A.: 1983, Viscosity renormalization in the Brinkman equation, Phys. Fluids 26, 2864–2870.Google Scholar
  16. Larson, R. E. and Higdon, J. J. L.: 1986, Microscopic flow near the surface of two-dimensional porous media. I. Axial flow, J. Fluid Mech. 166, 449–472.Google Scholar
  17. Lundgren, T. S.: 1972, Slow flow through stationary random beds and suspensions of spheres, J. Fluid Mech. 51, 273–299.Google Scholar
  18. Martys, N., Bentz, D. P. and Garboczi, E. J.: 1994, Computer simulation study of the effective viscosity in Brinkman's equation, Phys. Fluids 6(4), 1434–1439.Google Scholar
  19. Nield, D. A. and Bejan, A.: 1992, Convection in Porous Media, Springer, New York, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
  20. Richardson, S.: 1971, A model for the boundary condition of a porous material. Part 2, J. FluidMech. 49, 327–336.Google Scholar
  21. Saffman, P. G.: 1971, On the boundary condition at the surface of a porous medium, Stud. Appl. Math. 2, 93–101.Google Scholar
  22. Sahraoui, M. and Kaviany, M.: 1992, Slip and no-slip velocity boundary-conditions at interface of porous, plain media, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 35(4), 927–943.Google Scholar
  23. Shavit, U., Bar-Yosef, G., Rosenzweig, R. and Assouline, S.: 2002, Modified Brinkman equation for a free flow problem at the interface of porous surfaces: the Cantor–Taylor brush configuration case, Water Resour. Res. 38, 1320–1334.Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, G. I.: 1971, A model for the boundary condition of a porous material. Part 1, J. Fluid Mech. 49, 319–326.Google Scholar
  25. Vignes-Adler, M., Adler, P.M. and Gougat, P.: 1987, Transport processes along fractals. The Cantor–Taylor brush, PhysicoChemical Hydrodyn. 8(4), 401–422.Google Scholar
  26. Whitaker, S.: 1999, The Method of Volume Averaging, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Zhou, D. and Mendosa, C. C.: 1993, Flow through porous bed of turbulent stream, J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 119 365–383.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Shavit
    • 1
  • R. Rosenzweig
    • 1
  • S. Assouline
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil and Environment EngineeringTechnionHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental SciencesVolcani Center, A.R.O.Bet DaganIsrael

Personalised recommendations